R. Neil Sudol Lawyer Reviews & Ratings - Bridgeport
R. Neil Sudol lawyer reviews and ratings in Coleman Sudol Sapone, P.C. Bridgeport city, specializing in Patents law.
Average Rating: 3.35
Total Reviews 1
Total Reviews 1
R. Neil Sudol Lawyer Yelp Reviews
R. Neil Sudol
N/A R. Neil Sudol
Coleman Sudol Sapone, P.C.
Practice-Area(s)
Patents
Bridgeport, 6605
Address
714 Colorado Avenue,
Bridgeport
,
6605
Counties Fairfield County
6605 US 203-366-3560
Counties Fairfield County
6605 US 203-366-3560
Are you R. Neil Sudol or Client ? Claim this listing or Submit a review
Save Lawyer to Mylawbamba
Quick Summary Information for lawyer R. Neil Sudol on Lawbamba
R. Neil Sudol has received a total of 1 Avvo Ratings and 0 Yelp ratings.
- Free or Complimentary consultation may be available for a few hours.
- Bridgeport Lawyers Fees is generally in the range of $296-$366 per hour.
Compare R. Neil Sudol's Avvo and Yelp Reviews wth other lawyers in zip 6605
- Free or Complimentary consultation may be available for a few hours.
- Bridgeport Lawyers Fees is generally in the range of $296-$366 per hour.
Compare R. Neil Sudol's Avvo and Yelp Reviews wth other lawyers in zip 6605
How Can I Contact Lawyer R. Neil Sudol for Legal Advice?
Here are a few tips to break the ice once you have chosen your lawyers:
- How many years have you been in practice?
- How many Patents similair cases like mine have you handled?
- How often do you settle Patents cases out of court?
- What is your fees and the estimated cost of my specific case?
- Does lawyer R. Neil Sudol offer any Pro bono services?
- What are my next steps to proceed?
R. Neil Sudol serves 6605 . Switch Zip?
Cameron Atkinson
Reviews
K. I am very unsatisfied with his services. Let alone have the security called because the client wa ...read more from avvo
Avvo Rating 3.70/5
Explore more Patents Lawyers in ZIP Codes Nearby 6605
Which Lawyers in Bridgeport Are Rated Higher than R. Neil Sudol?
Cameron Atkinson
Reviews
K. I am very unsatisfied with his services. Let alone have the security called because the client wa ...read more from avvo
Avvo Rating 3.70/5