Top Consumer Protection Lawyers in Chicago | 9 available

9 Consumer Protection lawyers are available in Chicago, Illinois. These lawyers are rated between 4.3/5 to 4.7/5 and 53% provide free consultation.


9 Consumer Protection Lawyers Found Near You

Avvo Rating: Rated 4.6 out of 5
Lawyers Rating: Rated 4.4 out of 5

Location: Chicago 60661
Firm: The Civil Litigation Clinic at Chicago-Kent College of Law
Area(s) of Practice: Consumer Protection

Jamie Franklin is the Director of the Civil Litigation Clinic at Chicago-Kent College of Law, where she is a Clinical Professor of Law. Jamie is an advocate for employees, consumers, and other plaintiffs whose rights have been denied. She is dedicated to providing the highest level of legal representation to her clients in cases involving employment discrimination, retaliation, wage and hour law, whistleblower actions, consumer law, class actions, and other complex litigation.

Avvo Rating: Rated 1.0 out of 5
Lawyers Rating: Rated 4.9 out of 5

Location: Chicago 60602
Firm: Woerthwein & Miller
Area(s) of Practice: Consumer Protection

I'm interested in using technology to streamline the practice of law as well as to deliver services to those would would not normally be able to afford an attorney. I am currently in the final stages of launching a virtual law office at my firm. This online law office will allow us to provide unbundled legal services to the entire state of Illinois, as opposed to just the Chicago Metro area.

Avvo Rating: Rated 5.0 out of 5
Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.9 out of 5

Location: Chicago 60602
Firm: Robson & Lopez, LLC
Area(s) of Practice: Consumer Protection

I am a passionate, hard-working attorney that will fight for you the entire way. I will also actually sit down and talk to you. Part of representing you is telling you what is going on and why. You have rights, call me to enforce them!

Avvo Rating: Rated 5.0 out of 5
Lawyers Rating: Rated 5.0 out of 5

Location: Chicago 60603
Firm: Edelman, Combs, Latturner & Goodwin, LLC
Area(s) of Practice: Consumer Protection

Daniel A. Edelman is a member  of the firm of Edelman, Combs, Latturner & Goodwin, LLC.  He is a 1976 graduate of the University of Chicago Law School.  From 1976 to 1981 he was an associate at the Chicago office of Kirkland & Ellis.   In 1981 he became an associate at Reuben & Proctor and was made a partner there in 1982.  From the end of 1985 he has been in private practice in downtown Chicago.  Virtually all of his 14-attorney firm’s practice involves litigation on behalf of consumers, including individual and class actions under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, Fair Credit Reporting Act, Telephone Consumer Protection Act, Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, and Truth in Lending Act, and debt collection defense.  Mr. Edelman argued for the consumer in Heintz v. Jenkins, 514 U.S. 291 (1995), establishing  FDCPA coverage of attorneys.. Mr. Edelman is the author or coauthor of numerous publications on class actions and consumer protection law, including Predatory Mortgage Lending (Ill. Inst. for Cont. Legal. Educ. 2008), author of Chapter 6, “Predatory Lending and Potential Class Actions,” in Real Estate Litigation (Ill. Inst. For Cont. Legal Educ. 2008), Chapter 4-1, “Truth in Lending Act,” in Illinois Causes of Action (Ill. Inst. For Cont. Legal Educ. 2008), Predatory Lending and Potential Class Actions, ch. 6 of Illinois Mortgage Foreclosure Practice (Ill. Inst. For Cont. Legal );  Predatory Lending and Potential Class Actions, ch. 5 of Real Estate Litigation (Ill. Inst. For Cont. Legal ); Illinois Consumer Law, in Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act and Related Areas Update (Chicago Bar Ass’n 2002); Predatory Lending Litigation in Illinois (2001); Consumer Class Action Manual (2d-5th editions), National Consumer Law Center 1990-2002; Payday Loans:  Big Interest Rates and Little Regulation, 11 L.Rptr. 14 (1999); Fair Debt Collection Practices Act Update --  1999, Chicago Bar Ass’n 1999; An Overview of The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, in Financial Services Litigation, Practicing Law Institute (1999); Consumer Fraud and Insurance Claims, in Bad Faith and Extracontractual Damage Claims in Insurance Litigation, Chicago Bar Ass'n 1992; Chapter 8, "Fair Debt Collection Practices Act," Ohio Consumer Law (1995 ed.); Fair Debt Collection:  The Need for Private Enforcement, 7 L.Rptr. 89 (1995); The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act:  Recent Developments, 8 L. Rptr. 303 (1996); Residential Mortgage Litigation, in Financial Services Litigation, Practicing Law Institute (1996); Automobile Leasing:  Problems and Solutions, 7 L.Rptr. 14 (1994); Current Trends in Residential Mortgage Litigation, 12 Rev. of Banking & Financial Services 71 (1996); Applicability of Illinois Consumer Fraud Act in Favor of Out-of-State Consumers, 8 L.Rptr. 27 (1996); Illinois Consumer Law (Chicago Bar Ass'n 1996).  He has testified before the Federal Trade Commission and legislative committees on consumer related issues.. Mr. Edelman is licensed in Illinois state court and in all federal courts in Illinois, Wisconsin, Indiana and Michigan, as well as others.

Avvo Rating: Rated 5.0 out of 5
Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.4 out of 5

Location: Chicago 60602
Firm: Krohn & Moss, Ltd.
Area(s) of Practice: Consumer Protection

Avvo Rating: Rated 5.0 out of 5
Lawyers Rating: Rated 4.1 out of 5

Location: Chicago 60603
Firm: Robson & Lopez LLC
Area(s) of Practice: Consumer Protection

Avvo Rating: Rated 5.0 out of 5
Lawyers Rating: Rated 4.4 out of 5

Location: Chicago 60603
Firm: Keogh Law, LTD.
Area(s) of Practice: Consumer Protection

Avvo Rating: Rated 5.0 out of 5

Location: Chicago 60606
Firm: Kelly, Olson, Michod, DeHaan and Richter, L.L.C.
Area(s) of Practice: Consumer Protection

Avvo Rating: Rated 5.0 out of 5
Lawyers Rating: Rated 4.4 out of 5

Location: Chicago 60602
Firm: Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd.
Area(s) of Practice: Consumer Protection

Disclaimer: This content is based on aggregated public information and estimated market trends. It is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.