Top best Appellate Lawyers in ZIP 98002 | 1 available

1 Appellate lawyers are available in ZIP code 98002 in Muskegon, Michigan. Average rating of these lawyers is 4.5/5 and 54% provide free consultation with average fees of $376 per hour.

Appellate Lawyers Nearby Muskegon 98002 (by distance)

Within 25 miles near you

(Seattle Area) 98101 21.7 miles

(Seattle Area) 98121 22.1 miles

Within 50 miles near you

(Bainbridge Island Area) 98110 27.8 miles

Active Lawyers

1 - 1

Hourly Fees

$213 - $538

Free Consultations

46% - 62%

Average Rating

4.3 - 4.7 ★


FAQs - Appellate Lawyers in 98002 city Muskegon How many Appellate lawyers actively serve residents of Muskegon, Michigan? Approximately 16 licensed attorneys focus on Appellate across Muskegon, Michigan. Most matters are filed through the Michigan District Court, where local rules shape timelines and filing steps. What is the typical hourly fee for Appellate lawyers in Muskegon, Michigan? In Muskegon, typical rates range from $181-$374 per hour for Appellate. End-to-end case budgets frequently land between $3468 and $8529, depending on hearings and discovery. How long do Appellate matters usually take in courts near Muskegon? Appellate cases in Muskegon, Michigan usually take around 4-8 months depending on complexity and the Michigan District Court docket. Which local court most often hears Appellate cases for people living in Muskegon, Michigan? Residents of Muskegon typically see Appellate filings handled by the Michigan District Court. Proximity to helps with quick submissions and clerk communications. Do attorneys around offer a free first consultation for Appellate? About 68% of firms near ZIP offer a free first consultation for Appellate, so you can compare strategy and fit before committing.

1 Appellate Lawyers Found Near You

Avvo Rating: Rated 4.5 out of 5
Lawyers Rating: Rated 4.8 out of 5

Location: Auburn 98002
Firm: Van Siclen, Stocks & Firkins

As I look back on almost 30 years of practice, I have loved being a lawyer.  I have experience and success in a variety of fields, which has made me more well-rounded compared to those who emphasize only 1 or 2 areas of law.. I have obtained several rewarding and high settlements for clients in employment law, divorces, personal injury, civil rights and police misconduct cases. I obtained the highest jury verdict in Spokane County ($3 million) against a Sheriff's office for misconduct against my clients. I am a well-rounded trial attorney who has litigated a wide range of cases, including taking cases through mediation, arbitration, and if needed, trial and appeals courts. I have done thousands of both bench and jury trials.. In law school, they told us in orientation that a high percentage of lawyers wish they did not go to law school and become a lawyer, so I am in the minority - I would not change a thing.  The law is for me.  I am a "lifer", which means I will practice law until they drag me away.. I decided to become a lawyer after the Major League Baseball peoples did not draft me in the first few rounds when I was 18.  I pitched several "1 hitters" (yes, 1 hitters, not "no hitters") in high school and for American Legion at ages 16-18, however, I lacked a 4th pitch (slider, curve, and knuckle-curve was all I had).  Anyway, I also loved playing basketball and football, but when old age set in (age 24+), I began playing softball and have really enjoyed that over the years, until really old age set in (age 40+), and now I don't play as much.  Trying to pick up golf cuz I see a lot of older people out there swinging the clubs, but the last few years I have focused on Tennis.  I like martial arts, sports on t.v., great movies, great food, and being happy.  I had not traveled around the world much, until I met my wife, Hong, who has taken me to China many times now (wow, it is really cool).  My focus outside of work is my daughter, JoJo and her life!  Anyway, I still spend a lot of time doing work because I am obsessed with deadlines, client problems and being the best lawyer I possibly can.

Disclaimer: This content is based on aggregated public information and estimated market trends. It is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.