📍 Home   > Arizona   >> Appeals   >>> Phoenix   >>>> ZIP 85004

Top Appeals Lawyers in ZIP 85004 | 19 available

19 Appeals lawyers are available in ZIP code 85004 in Phoenix, Arizona. Average rating of these lawyers is 4.3/5 and 54% provide free consultation.

Appeals Lawyers Near ZIP 85004 - Map View

Showing top 10 Appeals attorneys in Phoenix, Arizona near ZIP code 85004. Click any pin to view lawyer details, ratings, and contact information. Gold pins indicate top-rated lawyers.


FAQs - Appeals Lawyers in 85004 city Phoenix How many Administrative Law, Appeals, Gaming, Bankruptcy, Commercial Real Estate, Construction, Arbitration, Landlord & Tenant, Native Peoples Law lawyers actively serve residents of Phoenix, Arizona (85004)? Approximately 12 licensed attorneys focus on Administrative Law, Appeals, Gaming, Bankruptcy, Commercial Real Estate, Construction, Arbitration, Landlord & Tenant, Native Peoples Law across Phoenix, Arizona (85004). Most matters are filed through the Arizona District Court, where local rules shape timelines and filing steps. How long do Administrative Law, Appeals, Gaming, Bankruptcy, Commercial Real Estate, Construction, Arbitration, Landlord & Tenant, Native Peoples Law matters usually take in courts near Phoenix (85004)? Administrative Law, Appeals, Gaming, Bankruptcy, Commercial Real Estate, Construction, Arbitration, Landlord & Tenant, Native Peoples Law cases in Phoenix, Arizona usually take around 4-8 months depending on complexity and the Arizona District Court docket. Which local court most often hears Administrative Law, Appeals, Gaming, Bankruptcy, Commercial Real Estate, Construction, Arbitration, Landlord & Tenant, Native Peoples Law cases for people living in Phoenix, Arizona? Residents of Phoenix typically see Administrative Law, Appeals, Gaming, Bankruptcy, Commercial Real Estate, Construction, Arbitration, Landlord & Tenant, Native Peoples Law filings handled by the Arizona District Court. Proximity to 85004 helps with quick submissions and clerk communications. Do attorneys around 85004 offer a free first consultation for Administrative Law, Appeals, Gaming, Bankruptcy, Commercial Real Estate, Construction, Arbitration, Landlord & Tenant, Native Peoples Law? About 67% of firms near ZIP 85004 offer a free first consultation for Administrative Law, Appeals, Gaming, Bankruptcy, Commercial Real Estate, Construction, Arbitration, Landlord & Tenant, Native Peoples Law, so you can compare strategy and fit before committing.
Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.5 out of 5

Adrian Paulino Fontes

Firm: The Law Offices of Adrian P Fontes Plc
420 E Roosevelt Rd , Phoenix , Arizona 85004
Practice Areas: Litigation, Consumer Protection, Criminal Defense, General Practice, Appeals
Avvo Rating: Rated 5.0 out of 5
Lawyers Rating: Rated 5.0 out of 5

John Alan Doran

Firm: Sherman & Howard
201 East Washington Street , Phoenix , Arizona 85004
Practice Areas: Appellate , Civil , Civil Rights, Labor , Appeals, Appeals, Appeals, Appeals, Appeals, Appeals, Appeals, Appeals, Appeals, Appeals, Appeals, Appeals, Appeals, Appeals, Appeals, Appeals, Appeals, Employment & Labor
Avvo Rating: Rated 3.4 out of 5
Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.4 out of 5

Steven G Mesaros

Firm: Renaud Cook Drury Mesaros, PA
One North Central Suite 900 , Phoenix , Arizona 85004
Practice Areas: Civil , Construction , Corporate , Insurance , Professional Malpractice, Insurance, Insurance, Insurance, Appeals, Litigation
Avvo Rating: Rated 5.0 out of 5
Lawyers Rating: Rated 5.0 out of 5

Roger L Cohen

Firm: Jaburg & Wilk PC
1850 North Central Ave , Phoenix , Arizona 85004
Practice Areas: Appeals, Business, Corporate & Incorporation, Family, Alimony, Administrative Law, Real Estate, Commercial, Lawsuits & Disputes, Litigation
Roger Cohen has over 40 years’ experience as a business attorney, representing clients in both litigation and transactions. He has a deep knowledge and understanding of commercial law and the litigation process and is a forceful and effective advocate for his clients. Roger’s experience as a transactional attorney adds value in the litigation setting, as he can relate the documentation process to issues that arise in business and commercial disputes. Conversely, his knowledge and skill as a litigator affords him an advantage in negotiating and drafting settlement agreements with maximum protections to his clients. This unique blend of expertise is particularly useful in workout representation.. He has long-standing relationships with business clients in a variety of industries, providing business counseling, transactional assistance and litigation services. For over 30 years, he has represented an independent escrow company, successfully defending numerous claims asserting alleged breaches of contract and fiduciary duties. He acted as Arizona lead counsel in an 18-year multiple state legal battle arising out of a jojoba investment scheme, and was litigation counsel for the receiver of a group of lenders taken over as the result of a Ponzi scheme investigation. Roger has obtained favorable results, through trial or settlement, for clients in a variety of matters, including legal and accounting malpractice, shareholder and partner disputes, employment contract and restrictive covenant disputes, bankruptcy adversary proceedings, and complex collections.. Roger has published articles and spoken on a variety of topics, including the Arizona homestead and judgment lien statutes, Uniform Commercial Code Articles 2 (sales) and 9 (secured transactions), attorney conflicts and misconduct, bankruptcy appeals, and civil procedure. His article “Foreign Judgments and Community Property” was published in Arizona Attorney in November, 2009 and he co-authored “The Top 50 Leading Cases that Shaped Life and Law in Arizona’s First 100 Years” published in Arizona Attorney in February 2012. He is co-author of a chapter of the recent Thompson Reuters publication, “Inside the Minds: Strategies for Consumer Bankruptcy Appeals”.. A former law clerk to the Honorable Duke Cameron, former Chief Justice of the Arizona Supreme Court, Roger has substantial experience as an appellate practitioner, having supervised and written numerous appellate briefs and argued cases in the Arizona Supreme Court, Arizona Court of Appeals, California Court of Appeals, and Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. His published decisions include: Phares v. Nutter, 125 Ariz. 291, 609 P.2d 561 (Ariz. Supreme Court 1980) (established right to debtor to seek relief from judgment registered under the Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act); Corporate Inv. Business Brokers v. Melcher, 824 F.2d 786 (9th Cir. 1987) (reversing District Court and holding that Colorado franchisee was subject to jurisdiction in Arizona in suit brought by franchisor); Mid Kansas Federal Sav. and Loan Ass’n of Wichita v. Dynamic Development Corp., 167 Ariz. 122, 804 P.2d 1310 (Ariz. Supreme Court 1991) (counsel for amicus curiae Southwest Savings & Loan Assoc.); Anderson v. Contes, 212 Ariz. 122, 128 P.3d 230 (Ariz. App. 2006); Austin Shea (Arizona) 7th Street and Van Buren, L.L.C. v. City of Phoenix, 213 Ariz. 385, 142 P.3d 693 (Ariz. App. 2006) and Rackmaster Systems, Inc. v. Maderia, 219 Ariz. 60, 193 P.3d 314 (Ariz. App. 2008).
Avvo Rating: Rated 3.7 out of 5
Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.7 out of 5

Peter Silverman

Firm: Zwillinger Wulkan PLC
2020 N Central Ave Ste 675 , Phoenix , Arizona 85004
Practice Areas: Child Custody & Visitation, Child Support, Divorce, Appeals
For more than two decades, Peter Silverman has delivered effective strategies for clients facing high-stakes, high-profile challenges in both the private and public sectors. A skilled litigator and trusted advisor, Peter is highly regarded for his outstanding representation of businesses, government leaders, and political candidates.As Chief of Staff and General Counsel to the Democrats at the Arizona Senate, Peter advised leadership on policy and strategy. He also counseled lawmakers on constitutional matters, and on ethics, conflict of interest and other laws governing officeholders. Peter is respected at the Capitol for working effectively with lawmakers on both sides of the political aisle.As an Assistant Attorney General in Arizona, Peter represented then-Secretary of State Janice K. Brewer in high-profile litigation concerning the constitutionality of Arizona election laws and other legislation. Peter also enforced state campaign finance laws. In 2006, Secretary Brewer signed a proclamation expressing her personal appreciation for Peter’s quality service.Peter exhibited the same level of skill and commitment as a litigator in the Phoenix office of two national, full-service business law firms. Peter also practiced several years at a prominent boutique firm in Phoenix focused on complex litigation and appellate advocacy.On his path to the legal profession, Peter advised U.S.-based and overseas clients at a communications and public affairs consulting firm in Washington, DC. He also spent four years at an NGO in Washington, DC strengthening democratic institutions overseas. Through this work, Peter observed elections in Haiti, Guatemala and Chile, and worked in Bangladesh, Burundi, Colombia, Ethiopia, Kenya, Liberia, Peru, Panama, Rwanda, Seychelles, Tanzania, Venezuela, and the former Yugoslavia.Peter graduated cum laude from the ASU College of Law, where he earned a coveted spot on the First Amendment Moot Court Team. During law school, Peter also interned for U.S. District Judge Robert C. Broomfield and U.S. District Judge Earl H. Carroll, and was chosen by his peers as the student speaker at his class graduation.EXPERIENCEPeter Silverman successfully defended the State of Arizona in a landmark federal case upholding a voter-approved measure requiring proof of citizenship when registering to vote, and voter identification when casting a ballot at the polls.Peter Silverman obtained a dismissal following a bench trial of a breach of contract and fraud action seeking seven-figure damages from clients, while also recovering clients’ attorneys’ fees and costs.Peter Silverman obtained a dismissal with prejudice of a federal court action seeking seven-figure damages against several companies and their leadership after successfully convincing the Court following targeted discovery that the plaintiffs had manufactured subject matter jurisdiction in violation of federal statute.
Avvo Rating: Rated 5.0 out of 5
Lawyers Rating: Rated 4.1 out of 5

Maxwell Mahoney

Firm: Jennings Strouss & Salmon, PLC
One East Washington Street , Phoenix , Arizona 85004
Practice Areas: Divorce, Family, Appeals, Divorce & Separation
Max Mahoney practices mainly Family Law, but also has experience in the areas of business, construction, real estate, and collections law. Max graduated cum laude from Arizona State University earning a Bachelor’s Degree in Interdisciplinary Studies focusing in Anthropology, History, and Political Science. Max attended Phoenix School of Law where he received his J.D. in 2011. While at Phoenix School of Law Max was the Administrative Editor for Phoenix Law Review. Max is licensed to practice in Arizona and is admitted to both the state and federal bar.
Lawyers Rating: Rated 5.0 out of 5

Mark J Depasquale

Firm: DePasquale Law Firm, P.C.
3300 N Central Ave Ste 2070 , Phoenix , Arizona 85004
Practice Areas: Appeals, Litigation
Avvo Rating: Rated 5.0 out of 5
Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.5 out of 5

Lori Voepel

Firm: Jones, Skelton & Hochuli, P.L.C.
40 N Central Ave., Ste. 2700 , Phoenix , Arizona 85004
Practice Areas: Appeals, Government
Lawyers Rating: Rated 4.3 out of 5

Kathi M Sandweiss

Firm: Jaburg & Wilk PC
1850 N. Central Avenue , Phoenix , Arizona 85004
Practice Areas: Appeals, Bankruptcy & Debt, Probate, Family, Administrative Law, Litigation
Kathi Sandweiss, a former award-winning television journalist, now enjoys a combined arbitration and appellate practice. She is a partner at Jaburg & Wilk, P.C., where she has practiced law over 30 years. Since 2016, Kathi has been an active commercial arbitrator on the roster of the American Arbitration Association. Her AAA cases have included complex asbestos trust claims, franchise agreements, service agreements, landlord/tenant disputes, emergency injunctive relief in a cannabis dispute and multiple consumer claims. She served as sole arbiter on a complex commercial case, with over $1.4 million in dispute, involving issues of breach of contract, UCC and agriculture law. She is currently chair of a three-arbitrator panel in a complex multi-state arbitration. In her capacity as an AAA neutral, she has addressed various procedural issues, including arbitrability, attorney disqualification, jurisdiction and discovery disputes.. She is on the Alternative Dispute Resolution Executive Council, State Bar of Arizona. She presented a seminar on arbitrability at the 2021 State Bar Convention and has written on the issue of delegation clauses in arbitration agreements – “Putting the Shine on Schein.”. Her arbitration practice is enhanced and enlightened by years of appellate experience – she has filed more than 150 appellate briefs and petitions for review in the Arizona Court of Appeals, the Arizona Supreme Court, the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and the U.S. Supreme Court, and has 23 published opinions.
Avvo Rating: Rated 3.9 out of 5
Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.8 out of 5

James L Csontos

Firm: Jennings, Haug & Cunningham, L.L.P.
2800 North Central Avenue Suite Eighteen Hundred , Phoenix , Arizona 85004
Practice Areas: Housing & Construction Defects, Appeals, Appeals, Appeals, Debt Collection, Contracts & Agreements, Commercial, Construction & Development, Arbitration, Litigation
Avvo Rating: Rated 5.0 out of 5
Lawyers Rating: Rated 4.6 out of 5

Amanda Szpakowski

Firm: Cantor Law Group
40 N Central Ave , Phoenix , Arizona 85004
Practice Areas: Family, Uncontested Divorce, Prenuptials, Domestic Violence, Divorce, Child Custody, Child Support, Child Abuse, Alimony, Adoption, Appeals
Amanda Szpakowski is a seasoned family law attorney with extensive experience representing clients in complex divorce, custody, and post-decree matters throughout the state of Arizona. She is licensed to practice in all Arizona counties and has successfully represented clients at both the trial and appellate levels. Her practice is particularly focused on high-net-worth individuals and families with intricate financial, legal, and custody considerations.. Ms. Szpakowski is known for delivering strategic, detail-oriented representation in matters involving business and asset valuation, forensic accounting issues, high-conflict custody disputes, spousal maintenance, and premarital or postnuptial agreements. Her litigation experience, combined with a strong understanding of financial and psychological dynamics, allows her to offer clients comprehensive, sophisticated solutions that protect their interests and long-term goals.. With over a decade of dedicated family law practice, Ms. Szpakowski approaches each case with precision and discretion. She is deeply committed to client service, ensuring that clients receive consistent communication, clear legal guidance, and a thorough understanding of each phase of the legal process. Her professionalism, preparation, and courtroom acumen have earned her a reputation as a trusted advocate for individuals facing some of the most significant and sensitive transitions of their lives.. Ms. Szpakowski holds a Juris Doctor from the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law at Arizona State University, where she concentrated in trial advocacy and family law. She earned her undergraduate degree Summa Cum Laude from Arizona State University, majoring in Psychology with a minor in Family and Human Development. During her academic career, she was recognized on the Dean’s List and was inducted into both Psi Chi, the International Honor Society in Psychology, and Phi Alpha Delta, the Pre-Law Fraternity.. At Cantor Law Group, Ms. Szpakowski is part of a distinguished team of attorneys committed to delivering high-caliber legal representation in family law.
Avvo Rating: Rated 5.0 out of 5
Lawyers Rating: Rated 5.0 out of 5

David Pierce Uffens

Firm: Jaburg Wilk
1850 N. Central Avenue , Phoenix , Arizona 85004
Practice Areas: Litigation, Business, Banking, Contracts & Agreements, Corporate & Incorporation, Entertainment, Securities Offerings, Constitutional, Education, Wills & Living Wills, Ethics & Professional Responsibility, Family, Personal Injury, Real Estate, Appeals
David focuses his practice in family law. He assists clients with divorces, child custody issues, post-decree modifications, and pre- and post-nuptial agreements. David is experienced with high conflict family law matters and has tried numerous cases. He has particular expertise when dealing with issues relative to children both during dissolution and issues that arise after a client’s divorce or establishment matter. David passionately advocates for what matters most to his clients and builds a strategic, custom game plan for each. He takes pride in the details and genuinely cares for his clients and the best interests of their children. While his primarily practice is family law, David continues to have a passion for sports law and teaches both Family Law and Sports Law courses at ASU’s College of Law.
Avvo Rating: Rated 3.4 out of 5
Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.4 out of 5

David N Farren

Firm: Jaburg & Wilk PC
1850 North Central Avenue , Phoenix , Arizona 85004
Practice Areas: Appellate , Business & Commercial, Civil , Labor , Employment & Labor, Employment & Labor, Corporate & Incorporation, Appeals, Litigation
David is a member of the litigation team at Jaburg Wilk. He concentrates his practice in business disputes, contracts, leases, commercial litigation and employment law. He has represented individuals, small businesses and major corporations for more than 30 years.. He has been involved in many complex and sometimes high-profile cases, including a groundbreaking movie industry antitrust case, a defamation case filed against Watergate burglar G. Gordon Liddy, and a $100,000, securities fraud Ponzi scheme case. He has tried or settled numerous cases in both state court and federal court and has pursued or defended, and won, more than 40 appeals in the Arizona Court of Appeals, the Arizona Supreme Court and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. In addition to his legal work, Dave is a founding member of the Arizona State Acupuncture Board, a former member of the Arizona State Foster Care Review Board, and a current member of the Foundation for PIHMA Research and Education. He is a frequent author, consultant and speaker.
Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.3 out of 5

David Ferrucci

Firm: Dickinson Wright PLLC
1850 N Central Ave Ste 1400 , Phoenix , Arizona 85004
Practice Areas: Appeals
Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.7 out of 5

Carlene Y Lowry

Firm: Snell & Wilmer LLP
1 E Washington St Ste 2700 , Phoenix , Arizona 85004
Practice Areas: Business, Corporate & Incorporation, Tax, Trusts, Appeals
Avvo Rating: Rated 3.3 out of 5
Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.3 out of 5

Brian Imbornoni

Firm: Nossaman LLP
2 N Central Ave Ste 1715 , Phoenix , Arizona 85004
Practice Areas: Agricultural , Appellate , Construction , Corporate , Insurance , Personal Injury, Agriculture, Agriculture, Contracts & Agreements, Commercial, Appeals, Litigation
Avvo Rating: Rated 4.3 out of 5
Lawyers Rating: Rated 4.2 out of 5

Bennett Cooper

Firm: Faith, Ledyard, Nickel and Shelsky, PLC
201 E Washington St Ste 1600 , Phoenix , Arizona 85004
Practice Areas: Business & Commercial, Contracts, Corporate , Real Estate , Zoning, Planning & Land Use, Appeals
Avvo Rating: Rated 4.7 out of 5
Lawyers Rating: Rated 5.0 out of 5

Amy Wilkins Hoffman

Firm: Hoffman Legal, LLC
99 E. Virginia Ave., Ste. 220 , Phoenix , Arizona 85004
Practice Areas: Business , Class Actions, Corporate , Professional Malpractice, Litigation, Litigation, Appeals
Avvo Rating: Rated 3.3 out of 5
Lawyers Rating: Rated 4.1 out of 5

Tracey Westerhausen

Firm: Debus Kazan & Westerhausen, Ltd.
335 East Palm Lane , Phoenix , Arizona 85004
Practice Areas: Criminal Defense , Appeals, Appeals
1

You have reached the Last Page!

Disclaimer: This content is based on aggregated public information and estimated market trends. It is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.