Top Entertainment Lawyers in ZIP 20015 | 1 available

1 Entertainment lawyers are available in ZIP code 20015 in Washington, District Of Columbia, including Rand Sacks. Average rating of these lawyers is /5 and 52% provide free consultation.

Entertainment Lawyers Near ZIP 20015 - Map View

Showing top 1 Entertainment attorneys in Washington, District of Columbia near ZIP code 20015. Click any pin to view lawyer details, ratings, and contact information. Gold pins indicate top-rated lawyers.


FAQs - Entertainment Lawyers in 20015 city Washington How many Entertainment lawyers actively serve residents of Washington, District Of Columbia (20015)? Approximately 15 licensed attorneys focus on Entertainment across Washington, District Of Columbia (20015). Most matters are filed through the District Of Columbia District Court, where local rules shape timelines and filing steps. How long do Entertainment matters usually take in courts near Washington (20015)? Entertainment cases in Washington, District Of Columbia usually take around 3-7 months depending on complexity and the District Of Columbia District Court docket. Which local court most often hears Entertainment cases for people living in Washington, District Of Columbia? Residents of Washington typically see Entertainment filings handled by the District Of Columbia District Court. Proximity to 20015 helps with quick submissions and clerk communications. Do attorneys around 20015 offer a free first consultation for Entertainment? About 55% of firms near ZIP 20015 offer a free first consultation for Entertainment, so you can compare strategy and fit before committing.

Rand Sacks

5335 Wisconsin Avenue Nw , Washington , District of Columbia 20015
Practice Areas: Entertainment
Rand Sacks founded The Sacks Group, PLLC (“TSG”) in November 2007. TSG is a highly-specialized boutique law firm, focused entirely within the sports and entertainment industries. TSG caters to athletes, agents, broadcasters, coaches, chefs, celebrities, as well as sports/entertainment events and properties. Mr. Sacks brings nearly 15 years of experience in sports management and representation to TSG. Mr. Sacks is an expert in sports and entertainment contracts, and on a daily basis, he drafts and negotiates countless types of sports and entertainment contracts. These include professional sports team contracts for coaches and athletes, college coaching contracts, marketing and endorsement agreements, representation agreements, stadium/naming rights, team/event sponsorships, and TV/movie production and talent agreements.. Current clients of TSG include Michael Jordan, Patrick Ewing, Troy Aikman, Joe Buck, Steve Young, Jay Cutler, Reggie Bush, Jim Furyk, Ben Howland, Mike Brey, Dan Jansen, and Bonnie Blair.. Before founding TSG, Mr. Sacks served as the General Counsel for WMG Management, and previously, as Assistant General Counsel for the SFX Sports Group. Former SFX-clients include: Kobe Bryant, Chase Utley, Andre Agassi, Andy Roddick, Brian Leetch, and Jerry Rice.. The aggregate value of the sports and entertainment contracts negotiated by Mr. Sacks is in excess of one billion dollars.. Mr. Sacks obtained his JD from the University of Pennsylvania Law School in 1996, and his BA from Emory University in 1993.. Mr. Sacks is a member of the DC Bar as well as the Sports Lawyers Association.  In 2008, Mr. Sacks was elected to the Steering Committee of Arts, Entertainment, and Sports Section of the DC Bar.  He is a frequent guest lecturer in colleges and law schools, and he is the author of “The Restricted Earnings Coach under Sherman Act Review,” which was published in the Spring 1997 edition of The Sports Lawyers Journal.
Lawyers.com Review
“Rands Sacks is one of the best lawyers the the sports/entertainment law arena. He has significant experience in almost every aspect of sports/entertainment law. He is a "client-fir…”
1

You have reached the Last Page!

Disclaimer: This content is based on aggregated public information and estimated market trends. It is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.