Lawbamba

Top best Natural Resources Lawyers in zip code 10022 New York

Home   ➤ New York   ➤➤ Zip- 10022 - New York - Natural Resources

We have more than 5 top best Natural Resources lawyers in zip code 10022, New York, New York. Howard J.C. Nicols, Jeffrey B. Greenberg are among the top best Natural Resources attorneys in zip code 10022. While choosing lawyers in zip code 10022, compare their reviews.


Howard J.C. Nicols - top best Natural Resources Lawyer in zip code 10022

Howard J.C. Nicols

Area of Practice: Civil ,Corporate ,Natural Resources,Securities

Zip code: 10022, New York, New York



Contact: 212-872-9800

350 Park Avenue   1Fifth Floor  10022.

Jeffrey B. Greenberg - top best Natural Resources Lawyer in zip code 10022

Jeffrey B. Greenberg

Area of Practice: Debtor/Creditor,Energy ,Natural Resources,Telecommunications

Zip code: 10022, New York, New York



Contact: 212-906-1200

Third Avenue.

David S. Yudelson - top best Natural Resources Lawyer in zip code 10022

David S. Yudelson

Rating: 3.35


Area of Practice: Asbestos ,Energy ,Natural Resources

Zip code: 10022, New York, New York



Contact: (212) 421-2150 (ext.
Sive, Paget & Riesel, P.C..
460 Park Ave  100221906.

Mark Zvonkovic - top best Natural Resources Lawyer in zip code 10022

Mark Zvonkovic

Rating: 3.35


Area of Practice: Natural Resources

Zip code: 10022, New York, New York



Contact: (212) 872-8008
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP.
590 Madison Avenue  100222524.

Dr. Joachim H. Borggraefe - top best Natural Resources Lawyer in zip code 10022

Dr. Joachim H. Borggraefe

Area of Practice: Natural Resources

Zip code: 10022, New York, New York



Contact: 49-69-25494-230
Kaye Scholer LLP.
425 Park Avenue  100223598.

FAQs - Natural Resources Attorneys in 10022

Natural Resources Case examples in zip code 10022

Description: Legal issues concerning the extraction and management of natural resources, including oil, gas, and minerals. Case Example: Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon (1922) - This landmark case addressed the regulation of mining activities and property rights. Judgment: The Supreme Court held that regulation could go too far and become a taking under the Fifth Amendment, requiring compensation.