Lawbamba

Top best Internet Lawyers in zip code 10038 New York

Home   ➤ New York   ➤➤ Zip- 10038 - New York - Internet

We have more than 5 top best Internet lawyers in zip code 10038, New York, New York. Micah W. Bloomfield, Laura E. Goldbard are among the top best Internet attorneys in zip code 10038. While choosing lawyers in zip code 10038, compare their reviews.


Micah W. Bloomfield - top best Internet Lawyer in zip code 10038

Micah W. Bloomfield

Rating: 4.25


Area of Practice: Internet ,Lender ,Real Estate

Zip code: 10038, New York, New York



Contact: 212-806-5400

180 Maiden Lane  10038.

Laura E. Goldbard - top best Internet Lawyer in zip code 10038

Laura E. Goldbard

Area of Practice: Copyrights,International & Trade,Internet ,Trademarks

Zip code: 10038, New York, New York



Contact: 212-806-5400

180 Maiden Lane  10038.

Ross F. Moskowitz - top best Internet Lawyer in zip code 10038

Ross F. Moskowitz

Rating: 3.85


Area of Practice: Administrative ,Environmental ,Internet ,Land Use & Zoning,Real Estate

Zip code: 10038, New York, New York



Contact: 212-806-5400

180 Maiden Lane  10038.

Steven B. Pokotilow - top best Internet Lawyer in zip code 10038

Steven B. Pokotilow

Rating: 4


Area of Practice: Copyrights,Information Technology,Intellectual Property ,International & Trade,Internet ,Patents,Trademarks

Zip code: 10038, New York, New York



Contact: 212-806-5400

180 Maiden Lane  10038.

Lawrence Rosenthal - top best Internet Lawyer in zip code 10038

Lawrence Rosenthal

Rating: 4.4


Area of Practice: Civil ,Computers and Software,Copyrights,Intellectual Property ,International & Trade,Internet ,Patents,Trademarks

Zip code: 10038, New York, New York



Contact: 212-806-5400

180 Maiden Lane  10038.

FAQs - Internet Attorneys in 10038

Internet Case examples in zip code 10038

Covers legal issues related to crimes committed via the internet under federal law. Case Example: United States v. Morris, 928 F.2d 504 (2d Cir. 1991). Involved a high-profile computer crime case. Judgment: The court ruled on appropriate sentencing for internet-related crimes.