Lawbamba

Top best Internet Lawyers in zip code 10601 White Plains

Home   ➤ New York   ➤➤ Zip- 10601 - White Plains - Internet

We have more than 3 top best Internet lawyers in zip code 10601, White Plains, New York. William G. Frenkel, Lee David Auerbach Esq. are among the top best Internet attorneys in zip code 10601. While choosing lawyers in zip code 10601, compare their reviews.


William G. Frenkel - top best Internet Lawyer in zip code 10601

William G. Frenkel

Rating: 3.5


Area of Practice: Business & Commercial,Corporate Finance,Corporate ,Immigration & Naturalization ,Intellectual Property ,International & Trade,Internet ,Mergers & Acquisitions,Securities

Zip code: 10601, White Plains, New York



Contact: 914-739-1600

North Broadway.

Lee David Auerbach Esq. - top best Internet Lawyer in zip code 10601

Lee David Auerbach Esq.

Area of Practice: Administrative ,Animal Bites,Antitrust & Trade Regulation,Arbitration & Mediation,Assault & Battery,Bankruptcy,Child Custody & Visitation,Child Support,Civil Rights,Communications & Media ,Condemnation & Eminent Domain,Consumer Protection,Debtor/Creditor,Discrimination,Elder ,Employment & Labor ,Franchise ,Intellectual Property ,Internet ,Landlord & Tenant,Legal Malpractice,Lemon ,Patents,Premises Liability,Securities ,Sexual Harassment,Taxation - State & Federal,Trademarks,Wrongful Death

Zip code: 10601, White Plains, New York



Contact: 914.428.7171 (White
Law Offices of Lee David Auerbach, P.C..
East Main Street.

Frank T. Spano - top best Internet Lawyer in zip code 10601

Frank T. Spano

Rating: 3.4


Area of Practice: Entertainment & Sports ,Internet ,Products Liability

Zip code: 10601, White Plains, New York



Contact: (212) 918-3522
Hogan & Hartson L.L.P.
South Broadway.

FAQs - Internet Attorneys in 10601

Internet Case examples in zip code 10601

Covers legal issues related to crimes committed via the internet under federal law. Case Example: United States v. Morris, 928 F.2d 504 (2d Cir. 1991). Involved a high-profile computer crime case. Judgment: The court ruled on appropriate sentencing for internet-related crimes.