Lawbamba
Login

Employee Benefits Lawyer in zip code 10605 | 1 Available

Thomas Feeney is among the available Employee Benefits attorney in zip code 10605. While choosing Employee Benefits attorneys in zip code 10605, compare their reviews.
🎚

Thomas Feeney - Employee Benefits Lawyer in zip code 10605

zipcode 10605 Employee Benefits Lawyer - Thomas Feeney
Thomas Feeney

Ratings:
Avvo Rating: Rated 5.0 out of 5
Lawyers.com Rating: Rated 3.7 out of 5



Area of Practice: Employee Benefits

Zip code: 10605, White Plains, New York

Thomas Feeney Avvo Reviews
MR FEENEY WAS VERY KNOWLEDGABLE AND SUPPORITIVE THOUGH MY WHOLE CASE ...

Contact: Not Available
Thomas E. Feeney.
16 Longview Ave.

Save this search to MyLawbamba
Share this Listing

No Q&As yet near 10605 (Employee Benefits)

Be the first to ask Lawbamba Community. Real Local lawyers answer.

Employee Benefits
10605
Open full form

By posting, you agree this is general information, not legal advice.

Selecting a Employee Benefits Attorney in 10605

No Q&As yet near 10605 (Employee Benefits)

Be the first to ask Lawbamba Community. Real Local lawyers answer.

Employee Benefits
10605
Open full form

By posting, you agree this is general information, not legal advice.

Selecting a Employee Benefits Attorney in 10605


Explore more Employee Benefits Lawyers in ZIP Codes Nearby 10605

White Plains, New York (ZIP 10601) - 1.9 miles away

Great Neck, New York (ZIP 11021) - 15.4 miles away

Teaneck, New Jersey (ZIP 07666) - 16.1 miles away

River Edge, New Jersey (ZIP 07661) - 16.3 miles away

Paranus, New Jersey (ZIP 07652) - 17.6 miles away

Westbury, New York (ZIP 11590) - 19.7 miles away

Garden City, New York (ZIP 11530) - 20.3 miles away

Forest Hills, California (ZIP 11375) - 20.4 miles away

New York, New York (ZIP 10022) - 20.9 miles away

New York, New York (ZIP 10103) - 21.0 miles away

Employee Benefits Case examples in zip code 10605

Legal issues related to employee benefit programs and plans. Case Example: Sweeney v. Board of Education (2017) - Dispute over employee benefits and plan eligibility. Judgment: The court ruled on the eligibility for benefits and ordered adjustments to the benefit plan.