Lawbamba

Top best Domestic Relations Lawyer in zip code 15219 - Heather Lynn Schmidt Bresnahan

Home   ➤ Pennsylvania   ➤➤ Zip- 15219 - Pittsburgh - Domestic Relations

Heather Lynn Schmidt Bresnahan is among the top best Domestic Relations attorney in zip code 15219. While choosing Domestic Relations attorneys in zip code 15219, compare their reviews

Use the Legal issue filters to select and navigate to other areas of practice within the zip.



Heather Lynn Schmidt Bresnahan - top best Domestic Relations Lawyer in zip code 15219

Heather Lynn Schmidt Bresnahan

Rating: / 3.8


Area of Practice: Family Law, Custody, Divorce, Real Estate, Adoptions, Alimony, Annulment, Child Custody, Child Protection, Child Support, Cohabitation Agreements, Divorce Mediation, Domestic Partnerships, Domestic Relations, Domestic Violence, Family Arbitration, Family Mediation, Grandparents Custody, Grandparents Visitation Rights, Marital Agreements, Legal Separation, Marital Property Distribution, Marital Property Law, Marital Property Settlements, Matrimonial Law, Name Changes, Palimony, Parental Rights, Parenting Time, Paternity, Post Divorce Modification, Post Nuptial Agreements, Premarital Agreements, Spousal Support, Termination of Parental Rights, Third Party Custody, Visitation Rights, Estate Planning, Powers of Attorney

Zip code: 15219, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania



Contact: 412-339-0000
Schmidt Bresnahan Law Group, LLC.
310 Grant Street.

John M. Schaffranek - top best Domestic Relations Lawyer in zip code 15219

John M. Schaffranek

Area of Practice: Family Law, Alimony, Child Custody, Child Support, Divorce, Domestic Relations, Visitation Rights

Zip code: 15219, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania



Contact: 412-471-0677
Feldstein Grinberg Lang & McKee, P.C..
428 Boulevard of the Allies.

FAQs - Domestic Relations Attorneys in 15219

Domestic Relations Case examples in zip code 15219

Legal matters concerning relationships within a domestic setting. Case Example: Miller v. Miller (2016) - Divorce case involving domestic relations issues. Judgment: The court resolved custody and property disputes based on domestic relations principles.