Lawbamba

Top best Intellectual Property Lawyer in zip code 18701 - William E. Vinsko Jr. Esquire

Home   ➤ Pennsylvania   ➤➤ Zip- 18701 - Wilkes-Barre - Intellectual Property

William E. Vinsko Jr. Esquire is among the top best Intellectual Property attorney in zip code 18701. While choosing Intellectual Property attorneys in zip code 18701, compare their reviews

Use the Legal issue filters to select and navigate to other areas of practice within the zip.



William E. Vinsko Jr. Esquire - top best Intellectual Property Lawyer in zip code 18701

William E. Vinsko Jr. Esquire

Area of Practice: Adoption,Agricultural ,Antitrust & Trade Regulation,Banking & Finance,Business & Commercial,Business Organizations,Child Custody & Visitation,Child Support,Communications & Media ,Condemnation & Eminent Domain,Constitutional ,Construction ,Consumer Protection,Contracts,Criminal Defense ,Debtor/Creditor,Discrimination,Divorce,Education ,Elder ,Election Campaign & Political ,Employment & Labor ,Energy ,Entertainment & Sports ,Environmental ,Estate Planning,Ethics & Professional Responsibility,Family ,Franchise ,Gaming ,Government Agencies,Government Contracts,Health Care & Hospitalization,Insurance ,Intellectual Property ,Internet ,Labor ,Land Use & Zoning,Landlord & Tenant,Medical Malpractice,Motor Vehicle Accidents,Natural Resources,Nursing Home Negligence,Personal Injury,Probate ,Products Liability,Professional Malpractice,Real Estate ,Securities ,Sexual Harassment,Social Security Benefits & Disability,Taxation - State & Federal,Toxic Substances,Trademarks,Traffic Violations,Transportation ,Trusts,Wills,Workers Compensation

Zip code: 18701, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania



Contact: (570) 970-9700
Vinsko & Associates.
South Franklin Street.

FAQs - Intellectual Property Attorneys in 18701

Intellectual Property Case examples in zip code 18701

Legal issues involving intellectual property within business contexts. Case Example: Smith v. IP Holder (2020) - Dispute over intellectual property rights and infringement. Judgment: The court ruled on the validity of intellectual property claims and awarded damages.