Lawbamba

Top best Products Liability Lawyers in zip code 33129 Miami

Home   ➤ Florida   ➤➤ Zip- 33129 - Miami - Products Liability

We have more than 3 top best Products Liability lawyers in zip code 33129, Miami, Florida. Scott R. McNary, A. Francisco Areces are among the top best Products Liability attorneys in zip code 33129. While choosing lawyers in zip code 33129, compare their reviews.


Scott R. McNary - top best Products Liability Lawyer in zip code 33129

Scott R. McNary

Rating: 5


Area of Practice: Civil Rights,Construction Defects,Construction ,Contracts,Defamation, Libel and Slander,Employment & Labor ,Insurance ,Liquor Liability,Medical Malpractice,Personal Injury,Products Liability,Professional Malpractice,Railroad/FELA,Wrongful Death

Zip code: 33129, Miami, Florida

Scott R. McNary Avvo Reviews
I was hit by an uninsured motorist and suffered multiple injuries. Mr. McNary found a "loophole" in my insurance and was able to recover a very large... ...

Contact: 305-856-0038
Law Offices of Scott R. McNary, P.A..
1150 Southwest 22 Street.

A. Francisco Areces - top best Products Liability Lawyer in zip code 33129

A. Francisco Areces

Rating: 3.35


Area of Practice: Corporate ,Family ,Medical Malpractice,Personal Injury,Products Liability,Wrongful Death

Zip code: 33129, Miami, Florida



Contact: 305-858-3300
Areces Rodriguez, P.A..
2121 Southwest 3rd Avenue   100.

Alexander R. Rodriguez - top best Products Liability Lawyer in zip code 33129

Alexander R. Rodriguez

Rating: 3.3


Area of Practice: Corporate ,Family ,Medical Malpractice,Personal Injury,Products Liability,Wrongful Death

Zip code: 33129, Miami, Florida



Contact: 305-858-3300
Areces Rodriguez, P.A..
2121 Southwest 3rd Avenue   100.

FAQs - Products Liability Attorneys in 33129

Products Liability Case examples in zip code 33129

Description: Deals with claims related to defects in ATVs, including design and manufacturing flaws. Case Example: Davis v. Polaris Industries, Inc., 2020 - Focused on product liability claims for defective ATVs. Judgment: The court awarded damages for injuries caused by the defective ATV.