Professional Malpractice Lawyer in zip code 35201 | 1 Available
Martha Thompson - Professional Malpractice Lawyer in zip code 35201
Ratings:
Avvo Rating:
Lawyers.com Rating:
Area of Practice: Employment & Labor , Insurance , Medical Malpractice, Municipal , Professional Malpractice, Workers Compensation, Project Finance, Project Finance, Project Finance, Project Finance, Project Finance, Project Finance
Zip code: 35201, Birmingham, Alabama
Contact: Not Available
Balch & Bingham, LLP.
Po Box 306.
No Q&As yet near 35201 (Professional Malpractice)
Be the first to ask Lawbamba Community. Real Local lawyers answer.
Who are the Top best Employment & Labor lawyers in zipcode 35201?
Martha Thompson is among the top rated Employment & Labor lawyer in Birmingham. The reviews and ratings are based on actual client feedback. The selected Birmingham Employment & Labor lawyer may be able to address other General legal issues such as Employment & Labor and other legal issues listed below in Birmingham,Alabama.Popular issues in Zipcode 35201
Insurance (284 available)
Medical Malpractice (103 available)
Municipal (34 available)
Professional Malpractice (37 available)
Project Finance (3 available)
Workers Compensation (132 available)
Project Finance (3 available)
Project Finance (3 available)
Project Finance (3 available)
Project Finance (3 available)
Project Finance (3 available)
Selecting a Professional Malpractice Attorney in 35201
Is the Professional Malpractice attorneys office in your own zipcode or locality?
Lawbamba helps you by showing the top best rated attorneys in Zipcode: 35201 for Professional Malpractice attorneys.
Once you browse through the list of top avvo and yelp reviewed attorneys in a selected zipcode you can also use the filters to sort by the lawyer ratings. The unique filters also allows you to change areas of practice and counties to provide a faster and wider search experience!
What are Lawbamba Avvo and Yelp Client Review Ratings in 35201
Lawbamba Client Review Ratings: Draws on Avvo and Yelp client reviews and comments and supplements the information available through Peer Review Ratings. Direct client reviews on a Professional Malpractice lawyer's qualities provides a unique another perspective and key information as you make your choice for legal services.
Having utilized your selected lawyers' services make sure you Professional Malpractice come back to review and rate the Professional Malpractice lawyer or the law firm you worked with for your case.
No Q&As yet near 35201 (Professional Malpractice)
Be the first to ask Lawbamba Community. Real Local lawyers answer.
Selecting a Professional Malpractice Attorney in 35201
Is the Professional Malpractice attorneys office in your own zipcode or locality?
Lawbamba helps you by showing the top best rated attorneys in Zipcode: 35201 for Professional Malpractice attorneys.
Once you browse through the list of top avvo and yelp reviewed attorneys in a selected zipcode you can also use the filters to sort by the lawyer ratings. The unique filters also allows you to change areas of practice and counties to provide a faster and wider search experience!
What are Lawbamba Avvo and Yelp Client Review Ratings in 35201
Lawbamba Client Review Ratings: Draws on Avvo and Yelp client reviews and comments and supplements the information available through Peer Review Ratings. Direct client reviews on a Professional Malpractice lawyer's qualities provides a unique another perspective and key information as you make your choice for legal services.
Having utilized your selected lawyers' services make sure you Professional Malpractice come back to review and rate the Professional Malpractice lawyer or the law firm you worked with for your case.
Professional Malpractice Case examples in zip code 35201
Legal issues involving malpractice claims against medical and other professionals, including negligence and litigation. Doe v. Healthcare Provider, 2020 WL 1456789 (E.D. Mich. 2020). Case Example: The court addressed professional malpractice claims, including medical negligence. Judgment: The court ruled on the merits of the malpractice claims and awarded damages.
