Lawbamba
Login

Information Technology Lawyer in zip code 43215 | 2 Available

Steven C. Karzmer is among the available Information Technology attorney in zip code 43215. While choosing Information Technology attorneys in zip code 43215, compare their reviews.
🎚

Steven C. Karzmer - Information Technology Lawyer in zip code 43215

zipcode 43215 Information Technology Lawyer - Steven C. Karzmer
Steven C. Karzmer

Ratings:
Avvo Rating: Rated 3.3 out of 5



Area of Practice: Corporate ,Information Technology,Mergers & Acquisitions

Zip code: 43215, Columbus, Ohio



Contact: 614-621-1500

1100 Fifth Third Center   21 East State Street O.

William Nolan - Information Technology Lawyer in zip code 43215

zipcode 43215 Information Technology Lawyer - William Nolan
William Nolan

Ratings:
Avvo Rating: Rated 3.7 out of 5
Lawyers.com Rating: Rated 3.9 out of 5



Area of Practice: Education , Employment & Labor , Information Technology, Civil Rights

Zip code: 43215, Columbus, Ohio



Contact: Not Available
Barnes & Thornburg LLP.
41 S High St Ste 3300.

Save this search to MyLawbamba
Share this Listing

No Q&As yet near 43215 (Information Technology)

Be the first to ask Lawbamba Community. Real Local lawyers answer.

Information Technology
43215
Open full form

By posting, you agree this is general information, not legal advice.

Selecting a Information Technology Attorney in 43215

No Q&As yet near 43215 (Information Technology)

Be the first to ask Lawbamba Community. Real Local lawyers answer.

Information Technology
43215
Open full form

By posting, you agree this is general information, not legal advice.

Selecting a Information Technology Attorney in 43215


Explore more Information Technology Lawyers in ZIP Codes Nearby 43215

Chicago, Illinois (ZIP 60606) - 275.3 miles away

Barrington, Illinois (ZIP 60010) - 308.0 miles away

Information Technology Case examples in zip code 43215

Legal aspects of technology used in managing health care information. Case Example: United States v. Harkins, 972 F.2d 709 (9th Cir. 1992). Judgment: The court addressed issues related to the misuse of health information technology.