Lawbamba

Top best Consumer Protection Lawyers in zip code 48302 Bloomfield Hills

Home   ➤ Michigan   ➤➤ Zip- 48302 - Bloomfield Hills - Consumer Protection

We have more than 4 top best Consumer Protection lawyers in zip code 48302, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan. James O. Elliott, Phillip E. Seltzer are among the top best Consumer Protection attorneys in zip code 48302. While choosing lawyers in zip code 48302, compare their reviews.


James O. Elliott - top best Consumer Protection Lawyer in zip code 48302

James O. Elliott

Rating: 3.25


Area of Practice: Consumer Protection,Elder ,Motor Vehicle Accidents,Nursing Home Negligence,Workers Compensation

Zip code: 48302, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan

James O. Elliott Avvo Reviews
...

Contact: (248) 334-1500(800)
The Law Offices of James O. Elliott.
43494 S Woodward Ave   205  4830.

Phillip E. Seltzer - top best Consumer Protection Lawyer in zip code 48302

Phillip E. Seltzer

Rating: 3.35


Area of Practice: Business ,Consumer Protection,Corporate ,Insurance ,Professional Malpractice

Zip code: 48302, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan



Contact: 248-593-5000
Lipson, Neilson, Cole, Seltzer and Garin, P.C..
3910 Telegraph Road   200.

Joseph P. Garin - top best Consumer Protection Lawyer in zip code 48302

Joseph P. Garin

Area of Practice: Consumer Protection,Corporate ,Employment & Labor ,Insurance ,Legal Malpractice,Professional Malpractice

Zip code: 48302, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan



Contact: 248-593-5000
Lipson, Neilson, Cole, Seltzer and Garin, P.C..
3910 Telegraph Road   200.

Howard A. Lax - top best Consumer Protection Lawyer in zip code 48302

Howard A. Lax

Rating: 3.25


Area of Practice: Banking & Finance,Consumer Protection,Lender ,Real Estate

Zip code: 48302, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan



Contact: 248-593-5000

3910 Telegraph Road   200.

FAQs - Consumer Protection Attorneys in 48302

Consumer Protection Case examples in zip code 48302

Legal matters involving protection of consumers in business transactions. Case Example: Doe v. Business (2019) - Dispute over consumer rights and business practices. Judgment: The court ruled in favor of consumer protection claims and awarded damages.