Lawbamba
Login

Copyrights Lawyer in zip code 77056 | 2 Available

Elizabeth King is among the available Copyrights attorney in zip code 77056. While choosing Copyrights attorneys in zip code 77056, compare their reviews.
🎚

Elizabeth King - Copyrights Lawyer in zip code 77056

zipcode 77056 Copyrights Lawyer - Elizabeth King
Elizabeth King

Ratings:
Avvo Rating: Rated 4.1 out of 5
Lawyers.com Rating: Rated 4.0 out of 5



Area of Practice: Civil , Copyrights, Intellectual Property , Trademarks, Intellectual Property

Zip code: 77056, Houston, Texas



Contact: Not Available
King Law Office, PLLC.
5622 Inwood Drive.

Tim Headley - Copyrights Lawyer in zip code 77056

zipcode 77056 Copyrights Lawyer - Tim Headley
Tim Headley

Ratings:
Avvo Rating: Rated 3.4 out of 5



Area of Practice: Copyrights,Patents,Trademarks

Zip code: 77056, Houston, Texas



Contact: 713-572-4321

Three Riverway.

Save this search to MyLawbamba
Share this Listing

No Q&As yet near 77056 (Copyrights)

Be the first to ask Lawbamba Community. Real Local lawyers answer.

Copyrights
77056
Open full form

By posting, you agree this is general information, not legal advice.

Selecting a Copyrights Attorney in 77056

No Q&As yet near 77056 (Copyrights)

Be the first to ask Lawbamba Community. Real Local lawyers answer.

Copyrights
77056
Open full form

By posting, you agree this is general information, not legal advice.

Selecting a Copyrights Attorney in 77056


Explore more Copyrights Lawyers in ZIP Codes Nearby 77056

Aventura, Florida (ZIP 33180) - 971.3 miles away

Los Angeles, California (ZIP 90067) - 1,375.4 miles away

New York, New York (ZIP 10036) - 1,424.9 miles away

New York, New York (ZIP 10019) - 1,425.4 miles away

New York, New York (ZIP 10022) - 1,426.0 miles away

Copyrights Case examples in zip code 77056

Description: General legal rights granted to creators of original works, including the exclusive right to reproduce, distribute, and perform their work. Case Example: Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios (1984) - Dispute over the legality of home video recording. Judgment: Court ruled that home recording for private use did not infringe copyrights.