Lawbamba

Top best Copyrights Lawyer in zip code 94102 - Daniel Ray Bacon

Home   ➤ California   ➤➤ ZIP - 94102 - Copyrights - San Francisco
Daniel Ray Bacon is among the top best Copyrights attorney in zip code 94102. While choosing Copyrights attorneys in zip code 94102, compare their reviews


Spin Your ZIP and Find a Lawyer Instantly!

    Spin 🎚

Daniel Ray Bacon - top best Copyrights Lawyer in zip code 94102

Daniel Ray Bacon Top Best Copyrights Lawyer in zip 94102
Daniel Ray Bacon

Rating: 2


Area of Practice: Administrative ,Americans with Disabilities Act,Civil ,Civil Rights,Construction ,Contracts,Copyrights,Criminal Defense ,Discrimination,Education ,Employment & Labor ,Entertainment & Sports ,Family ,Gay and Lesbian ,General Practice,Government Agencies,Guardianship and Conservatorship,Intellectual Property ,Labor ,Personal Injury,Probate ,Real Estate ,Sexual Harassment,Social Security Benefits & Disability,Wrongful Death,Wrongful Termination

Zip code: 94102, San Francisco, California

Daniel Ray Bacon Avvo Reviews
TRIPLE BEWARE!!! Stay far away from this guy! He did nothing but bs about how fantastic and successful he was at wrongful terminations and sexual d... ...

Contact: 415-864-0907
Daniel Ray Bacon.
234 Van Ness Avenue.

William F. Abbott - top best Copyrights Lawyer in zip code 94102

William F. Abbott Top Best Copyrights Lawyer in zip 94102
William F. Abbott

Area of Practice: Banking & Finance,Bankruptcy,Business & Commercial,Business ,Collections,Construction ,Contracts,Copyrights,Corporate ,Debtor/Creditor Rights,Landlord & Tenant,Real Estate ,Trademarks

Zip code: 94102, San Francisco, California



Contact: 415-863-9337
William F. Abbott.
211 Gough Street   201.

FAQs - Copyrights Attorneys in 94102

Copyrights Case examples in zip code 94102

Description: General legal rights granted to creators of original works, including the exclusive right to reproduce, distribute, and perform their work. Case Example: Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios (1984) - Dispute over the legality of home video recording. Judgment: Court ruled that home recording for private use did not infringe copyrights.


FAQs - Copyrights Attorneys in 94102