Lawbamba

Top best Employer Rights Lawyers in zip code 95826 Sacramento

Home   ➤ California   ➤➤ Zip- 95826 - Sacramento - Employer Rights

We have more than 3 top best Employer Rights lawyers in zip code 95826, Sacramento, California. Corey M. Day, Julio N. Colomba are among the top best Employer Rights attorneys in zip code 95826. While choosing lawyers in zip code 95826, compare their reviews.


Corey M. Day - top best Employer Rights Lawyer in zip code 95826

Corey M. Day

Area of Practice: Federal Employers Liability Act FELA, Railroad Liability, Railroad Litigation, Railway Labor Law, Federal Civil Litigation, Employer Rights, Employment Defense, Wrongful Termination Defense, Winery Law, Brewery Law, Distillery Law

Zip code: 95826, Sacramento, California



Contact: 916-400-2300
Murphy, Campbell, Alliston & Quinn.
8801 Folsom Boulevard.

Julio N. Colomba - top best Employer Rights Lawyer in zip code 95826

Julio N. Colomba

Area of Practice: Property Damage, Federal Civil Litigation, Employment Defense, Federal Employers Liability Act FELA, Personal Injury Defense, Employer Rights, Public Utility Law, Railroad Liability, Railroad Litigation, Railroad Labor Law

Zip code: 95826, Sacramento, California



Contact: 916-400-2300
Murphy, Campbell, Alliston & Quinn.
8801 Folsom Boulevard.

Stephanie L. Quinn - top best Employer Rights Lawyer in zip code 95826

Stephanie L. Quinn

Area of Practice: Federal Employers Liability Act FELA, Railroad Liability, Railroad Litigation, Railway Labor Law, Defense Litigation, Federal Civil Litigation, Trial Practice, Government Risk Management, Employer Rights, Employment Defense, Wrongful Termination Defense, Public Utility Law, Torts

Zip code: 95826, Sacramento, California



Contact: 916-400-2300
Murphy, Campbell, Alliston & Quinn.
8801 Folsom Boulevard.

count 3 Top best Employer Rights lawyers in Sacramento

Legal issues involving the rights and obligations of employees and employers. Case Example: Smith v. XYZ Corporation (2020) - Lawsuit over wrongful termination and violation of employee rights. Judgment: The court awarded damages for wrongful termination and mandated changes in employment practices.