Public Finance Lawyer in zip code 95864 | 2 Available
Ravinder Singh Kapoor - Public Finance Lawyer in zip code 95864
Area of Practice: Public Finance
Zip code: 95864, Sacramento, California
Contact: 916-653-5791
1708 Ladino Rd.
Thomas Fellenz - Public Finance Lawyer in zip code 95864
Ratings:
Lawyers.com Rating:
Area of Practice: Public Finance & Tax Exempt Finance
Zip code: 95864, Sacramento, California
Contact: Not Available
California High-Speed Rail Authority.
4312 Sierra Madre Dr.
No Q&As yet near 95864 (Public Finance)
Be the first to ask Lawbamba Community. Real Local lawyers answer.
Who are the Top best Public Finance lawyers in zipcode 95864?
Ravinder Singh Kapoor, Thomas Fellenz are among the top rated Public Finance lawyers in zipcode 95864. The reviews and ratings are based on actual client feedback. The selected 95864 Public Finance lawyer may be able to address other General legal issues such as Public Finance in California.Popular issues in Zipcode 95864
Public Finance (35 available)
Selecting a Public Finance Attorney in 95864
Is the Public Finance attorneys office in your own zipcode or locality?
Lawbamba helps you by showing the top best rated attorneys in Zipcode: 95864 for Public Finance attorneys.
Once you browse through the list of top avvo and yelp reviewed attorneys in a selected zipcode you can also use the filters to sort by the lawyer ratings. The unique filters also allows you to change areas of practice and counties to provide a faster and wider search experience!
What are Lawbamba Avvo and Yelp Client Review Ratings in 95864
Lawbamba Client Review Ratings: Draws on Avvo and Yelp client reviews and comments and supplements the information available through Peer Review Ratings. Direct client reviews on a Public Finance lawyer's qualities provides a unique another perspective and key information as you make your choice for legal services.
Having utilized your selected lawyers' services make sure you Public Finance come back to review and rate the Public Finance lawyer or the law firm you worked with for your case.
No Q&As yet near 95864 (Public Finance)
Be the first to ask Lawbamba Community. Real Local lawyers answer.
Selecting a Public Finance Attorney in 95864
Is the Public Finance attorneys office in your own zipcode or locality?
Lawbamba helps you by showing the top best rated attorneys in Zipcode: 95864 for Public Finance attorneys.
Once you browse through the list of top avvo and yelp reviewed attorneys in a selected zipcode you can also use the filters to sort by the lawyer ratings. The unique filters also allows you to change areas of practice and counties to provide a faster and wider search experience!
What are Lawbamba Avvo and Yelp Client Review Ratings in 95864
Lawbamba Client Review Ratings: Draws on Avvo and Yelp client reviews and comments and supplements the information available through Peer Review Ratings. Direct client reviews on a Public Finance lawyer's qualities provides a unique another perspective and key information as you make your choice for legal services.
Having utilized your selected lawyers' services make sure you Public Finance come back to review and rate the Public Finance lawyer or the law firm you worked with for your case.
Explore more Public Finance Lawyers in ZIP Codes Nearby 95864
Sacramento, California (ZIP 95814) - 6.4 miles away
West Sacramento, California (ZIP 95605) - 8.8 miles away
Martinez, California (ZIP 94553) - 59.4 miles away
San Francisco, California (ZIP 94111) - 77.7 miles away
San Francisco, California (ZIP 94105) - 77.9 miles away
San Francisco, California (ZIP 94107) - 79.2 miles away
San Francisco, California (ZIP 94102) - 79.4 miles away
San Francisco, California (ZIP 94128) - 86.2 miles away
San Jose, California (ZIP 95113) - 90.9 miles away
San Jose, California (ZIP 95126) - 91.8 miles away
Public Finance Case examples in zip code 95864
Legal matters related to public sector financing and budgets. Case Example: Doe v. Public Finance Dispute, 2154 WL 2345678 (N.D. Ill. 2154) ?ispute involving public finance and budget allocations. Judgment: The court resolved the dispute and directed changes to the budget allocations.