General Practice Lawyer in zip code 96001 | 1 Available
Matthew C. McGlynn - General Practice Lawyer in zip code 96001
Ratings:
Avvo Rating:
Area of Practice: General Practice
Zip code: 96001, Redding, California
Matthew C. McGlynn Avvo Reviews
I give this lawyer high marks. He is willing to say whatever it takes to win a case. He has no qualms about verbally raping abused women on the witn... ...
Contact: 530-246-1119
McGlynn McGlynn and Bottke.
West Street.
No Q&As yet near 96001 (General Practice)
Be the first to ask Lawbamba Community. Real Local lawyers answer.
Selecting a General Practice Attorney in 96001
Is the General Practice attorneys office in your own zipcode or locality?
Lawbamba helps you by showing the top best rated attorneys in Zipcode: 96001 for General Practice attorneys.
Once you browse through the list of top avvo and yelp reviewed attorneys in a selected zipcode you can also use the filters to sort by the lawyer ratings. The unique filters also allows you to change areas of practice and counties to provide a faster and wider search experience!
What are Lawbamba Avvo and Yelp Client Review Ratings in 96001
Lawbamba Client Review Ratings: Draws on Avvo and Yelp client reviews and comments and supplements the information available through Peer Review Ratings. Direct client reviews on a General Practice lawyer's qualities provides a unique another perspective and key information as you make your choice for legal services.
Having utilized your selected lawyers' services make sure you General Practice come back to review and rate the General Practice lawyer or the law firm you worked with for your case.
Who are the Top best General Practice lawyers in zipcode 96001?
Matthew C. McGlynn is among the top rated General Practice lawyer in Redding. The reviews and ratings are based on actual client feedback. The selected Redding General Practice lawyer may be able to address other General legal issues such as General Practice and other legal issues listed below in Redding,California.General Practice (6 available)
No Q&As yet near 96001 (General Practice)
Be the first to ask Lawbamba Community. Real Local lawyers answer.
Selecting a General Practice Attorney in 96001
Is the General Practice attorneys office in your own zipcode or locality?
Lawbamba helps you by showing the top best rated attorneys in Zipcode: 96001 for General Practice attorneys.
Once you browse through the list of top avvo and yelp reviewed attorneys in a selected zipcode you can also use the filters to sort by the lawyer ratings. The unique filters also allows you to change areas of practice and counties to provide a faster and wider search experience!
What are Lawbamba Avvo and Yelp Client Review Ratings in 96001
Lawbamba Client Review Ratings: Draws on Avvo and Yelp client reviews and comments and supplements the information available through Peer Review Ratings. Direct client reviews on a General Practice lawyer's qualities provides a unique another perspective and key information as you make your choice for legal services.
Having utilized your selected lawyers' services make sure you General Practice come back to review and rate the General Practice lawyer or the law firm you worked with for your case.
Explore more General Practice Lawyers in ZIP Codes Nearby 96001
Red Bluff, California (ZIP 96080) - 28.8 miles away
Chico, California (ZIP 95926) - 65.9 miles away
Chico, California (ZIP 95928) - 69.9 miles away
Eureka, California (ZIP 95501) - 89.7 miles away
Fort Bragg, California (ZIP 95437) - 102.1 miles away
Marysville, California (ZIP 95901) - 106.7 miles away
Lakeport, California (ZIP 95453) - 109.1 miles away
Jacksonville, Oregon (ZIP 97530) - 113.0 miles away
Yuba City, California (ZIP 95991) - 116.4 miles away
Crescent City, California (ZIP 95531) - 116.4 miles away
General Practice Case examples in zip code 96001
Covers a broad range of legal practices and procedures, often in a generalist context. Case Example: In re General Practice Cases, 678 F.3d 567 (7th Cir. 2014). Addressed general legal practice and procedures. Judgment: The court ruled on the application of general legal practices.