Top best Administrative Lawyers in ZIP 20005 | 53 available

53 Administrative lawyers are available in ZIP code 20005 in Cambridge, Maryland. Average rating of these lawyers is /5 and 51% provide free consultation with average fees of $342 per hour.

Administrative Lawyers Nearby Cambridge 20005 (by distance)

Within 10 miles near you

(Alexandria Area) 22314 6.8 miles

Within 25 miles near you

(McLean Area) 22102 11.1 miles

(Woodbridge Area) 22193 24.9 miles

Within 50 miles near you

(Towson Area) 21286 42.9 miles

(Frederick Area) 21702 45.9 miles

Greater than 50 miles near you

(Bel Air Area) 21014 56.8 miles

Active Lawyers

31 - 53

Hourly Fees

$201 - $482

Free Consultations

38% - 64%


FAQs - Administrative Lawyers in 20005 city Cambridge How many Administrative lawyers actively serve residents of Cambridge, Maryland? Approximately 29 licensed attorneys focus on Administrative across Cambridge, Maryland. Most matters are filed through the Maryland District Court, where local rules shape timelines and filing steps. What is the typical hourly fee for Administrative lawyers in Cambridge, Maryland? In Cambridge, typical rates range from $186-$381 per hour for Administrative. End-to-end case budgets frequently land between $2582 and $7491, depending on hearings and discovery. How long do Administrative matters usually take in courts near Cambridge? Administrative cases in Cambridge, Maryland usually take around 4-10 months depending on complexity and the Maryland District Court docket. Which local court most often hears Administrative cases for people living in Cambridge, Maryland? Residents of Cambridge typically see Administrative filings handled by the Maryland District Court. Proximity to helps with quick submissions and clerk communications. Do attorneys around offer a free first consultation for Administrative? About 68% of firms near ZIP offer a free first consultation for Administrative, so you can compare strategy and fit before committing.

53 Administrative Lawyers Found Near You

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.7 out of 5

Location: Washington 20005

Parker Moore is an associate in the Washington, D.C. office of Beveridge & Diamond, P.C. with an environmental, litigation, and regulatory practice focusing on land use issues involving the Clean Water Act (CWA), Endangered Species Act, National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and related federal natural resources statutes.. During his time with Beveridge & Diamond, Mr. Moore has defended private parties and public agencies in their NEPA compliance efforts.  He regularly counsels private developers through the Section 404 permitting program under the CWA and recently co-authored a Supreme Court amicus brief on behalf of a coalition of national real estate and development associations in the controversial wetlands regulation case, Rapanos v. United States. In the wake of this ruling, Mr. Moore has published several articles on the state of federal wetlands regulation and its impacts on land use interests. Mr. Moore has also counseled private developers in administrative proceedings related to construction regulatory compliance under the CWA’s NPDES program.. Before joining the firm in 2004, Mr. Moore clerked at the White House Council on Environmental Quality and served as a judicial intern to the Honorable Robert H. Hodges of the United States Court of Federal Claims.. Mr. Moore received a bachelor of science degree in Natural Resources from the University of the South in Sewanee, Tennessee. He graduated magna cum laude from Vermont Law School, where he was an articles editor for the Vermont Law Review. Before receiving his law degree, he served as a wetlands ecologist for a private environmental consulting firm. In this capacity, Mr. Moore performed extensive onsite evaluation and consultation involving complex federal, state, and local environmental issues including CERCLA, the Clean Water Act, the Endangered Species Act, the Virginia Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act, and construction regulatory compliance.

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.6 out of 5

Location: Washington 20005
Firm: Williams & Connolly

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.3 out of 5

Location: Washington 20005
Firm: Williams & Connolly

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.4 out of 5

Location: Washington 20005
Firm: Betts & Holt LLP

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.6 out of 5

Location: Washington 20005
Firm: Hyman, Phelps & McNamara, P.C.

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.4 out of 5

Location: Washington 20005
Firm: Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.4 out of 5

Location: Washington 20005
Firm: McGuiness Norris & Williams LLP

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.4 out of 5

Location: Washington 20005

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.3 out of 5

Location: Washington 20005
Firm: Verizon

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.3 out of 5

Location: Washington 20005
Firm: Sidley Austin

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.3 out of 5

Location: Washington 20005

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.4 out of 5

Location: Washington 20005
Firm: Beveridge & Diamond, P.C.

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.4 out of 5

Location: Washington 20005

Lawyers Rating: Rated 4.0 out of 5

Location: Washington 20005
Firm: Williams & Connolly

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.7 out of 5

Location: Washington 20005
Firm: Williams & Connolly

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.4 out of 5

Location: Washington 20005
Firm: Reed Smith LLP

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.5 out of 5

Location: Washington 20005
Firm: Beveridge & Diamond, P.C.

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.8 out of 5

Location: Washington 20005
Firm: Williams & Connolly

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.7 out of 5

Location: Washington 20005
Firm: Benach Ragland LLP

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.6 out of 5

Location: Washington 20005
Firm: Locke Liddell & Sapp

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.7 out of 5

Location: Washington 20005

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.6 out of 5

Location: Washington 20005

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.9 out of 5

Location: Washington 20005
Firm: Andrews Kurth, LLP

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.8 out of 5

Location: Washington 20005
Firm: Williams & Connolly

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.8 out of 5

Location: Washington 20005
Firm: Williams & Connolly

1 2 3 Next

Disclaimer: This content is based on aggregated public information and estimated market trends. It is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.