Top best Litigation Lawyers Near me in ZIP 60093

Looking for Litigation lawyers near ZIP code 60093 in Northfield, California? Browse experienced attorneys with reviews and ratings.

Litigation Lawyers Nearby Northfield 60093 (by distance)

Within 5 miles

(Glencoe Area) 60022 2.3 miles

(Wilmette Area) 60091 2.4 miles

(Glenview Area) 60025 3.4 miles

(Morton Grove Area) 60053 4.5 miles

(Evanston Area) 60201 4.5 miles

(Skokie Area) 60077 4.6 miles

(Northbrook Area) 60062 4.6 miles

(Skokie Area) 60076 5.0 miles

Within 10 miles

(Niles Area) 60714 5.9 miles

(Evanston Area) 60202 6.1 miles


FAQs - Litigation Lawyers in city Northfield How many Litigation lawyers actively serve residents of Northfield, California? Approximately 55 licensed attorneys focus on Litigation across Northfield, California. Most matters are filed through the California District Court, where local rules shape timelines and filing steps. What is the typical hourly fee for Litigation lawyers in Northfield, California? In Northfield, typical rates range from $229-$439 per hour for Litigation. End-to-end case budgets frequently land between $3948 and $7799, depending on hearings and discovery. How long do Litigation matters usually take in courts near Northfield? Litigation cases in Northfield, California usually take around 3-6 months depending on complexity and the California District Court docket. Which local court most often hears Litigation cases for people living in Northfield, California? Residents of Northfield typically see Litigation filings handled by the California District Court. Proximity to helps with quick submissions and clerk communications. Do attorneys around offer a free first consultation for Litigation? About 45% of firms near ZIP offer a free first consultation for Litigation, so you can compare strategy and fit before committing.

17 Litigation Lawyers Found Near You

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.9 out of 5
Not Available
Location: Northfield 60093
Firm: Franklin Law Group

Justin Fielkow joined the Franklin Law Group after moving to Chicago from New Orleans, LA. He has experience in a variety of business and commercial civil litigation matters, in both state and federal court, including breach of contract, bad faith insurance prosecution, professional malpractice, qui tam, civil RICO, defamation and libel, and sports torts. Justin has obtained successful verdicts at both trial and arbitration and negotiated numerous favorable settlements. Justin also represents businesses in the sports and entertainment fields, by consulting for and providing an array of legal services to sports-related organizations, including fantasy sports ventures, sports media entities, and sports and entertainment marketing and branding companies. His insights regarding sports and entertainment law have appeared in publications such as the International Business Times, Law360, the New York Daily News, Rolling Stone, the Boston Herald, and numerous others.. Outside of practicing law, Justin has written for RotoWire, both as a featured legal columnist and as a beat writer covering fantasy football. His articles have appeared both online and in nationally-distributed magazines. He is also a co-founder and writer for The Sports Law Esquires, a website dedicated to providing legal analysis and insight generated by current events in the sports industry. In addition, Justin is passionate about volunteering his time and has worked countless pro bono hours at non-profit organizations, including the Redwood Justice Fund based in California and the ELLA Project in New Orleans.. Representative Matters. Justin has recently:

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.6 out of 5
Not Available
Location: Northfield 60093
Firm: Neal & McDevitt, LLC

I spent more than a decade in Silicon Valley, where I worked for two premier law firms (Howard Rice and Cooley) handling IP disputes for some of the best known brands in the world.. Representative cases include:. Trademark Cases. Facebook. Jeff has represented Facebook in more than a dozen trademark litigation matters, both in federal courts and before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board:. • Facebook v. Teachbook, No. 2011-cv-03052 (N.D. Ill.) (challenge to TEACHBOOK mark). • Lamebook v. Facebook, No. 2010-cv-00833 (W.D. Tex) (challenge to LAMEBOOK mark). • Facebook v. Various, No. 2011-cv-01805 (N.D. Cal.) (challenging FACEBOOK OF SEX mark). • Timepnes v. Facebook, No. 2011-cv-06967 (N.D. Ill.) (challenging Facebook’s use of “timepne”). • CVG-SAB v. Facebook, No. 2012-cv-14521 (E.D. Mich.) (challenging Facebook’s use of “want”). • Think Computer Corporation v. Facebook, No. 92049206 (T.T.A.B.) (genericness challenge to FACEBOOK mark). • Facebook v. PetVetSpace, No. 91189492 (T.T.A.B.) (application to register VETBOOK). • Facebook v. Lee, No. 91188901 (T.T.A.B.) (application to register DRUNK WALL). • Facebook v. Everclear Communications, No. 91191915 (T.T.A.B.) (application to register TALKBOOK). • Facebook v. Bob Weiss, No. 91199373 (T.T.A.B.) (application to register FACEBROKER). • Facebook v. Resorb Networks (T.T.A.B.) (application to register FACEPILES). • Facebook v. Where, No. 91198868 (T.T.A.B.) (application to register PLACEBOOK). • Facebook v. Think Computer Corporation, No. 91198355 (T.T.A.B) (application to register FACEMAIL). • Facebook v. SNRG Ventures, No. 91200221 (T.T.A.B.) (application to register SHAGBOOK). Google. Jeff has represented Google in a number of trademark enforcement and defensive matters, including litigation before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board:. • Google v. Doeswijk, No. 91198947 (T.T.A.B.) (application to register WINDROID). • Google v. Beckner, No. 91205920 (T.T.A.B.) (application to register G+). • Google v. Williams, No. 91204159 (T.T.A.B.) (application to register APARTMENT ANDROID). • Google v. Farnsworth, Boulter, Burke & Stamper, No. 91211077 (T.T.A.B.) (application to register ICOMMANDROID). • Google v. VIA Technologies, No. 92056816 (T.T.A.B.) (petition to cancel CHROME). • Google v. Shenzhen Golden – Window Electronic & Technology Company, No. 91208523 (T.T.A.B.) (application to register PANDROID). • Google v. Fujii, No. 91208115 (T.T.A.B.) (application to register SUPERANDROID). • Google v. Border Stylo, No. 92058815 (T.T.A.B.) (petition to cancel WRITE ON GLASS). • Factory Holdings and Border Stylo v. Google, No. 91214017 (T.T.A.B.) (application to register GOOGLE GLASS). Other Trademark Matters. • Keeper Security, Inc. v. Dashlane, Inc., No. 2015-cv-07440 (N.D. Ill.) (alleged trademark infringement). • BDO Remit USA v. Stichting BDO, No. 2011-cv-04054 (C.D. Cal.) (use of BDO REMIT). • Victory Outreach Corporation v. Twitter, No. 2013-cv-01501 (E.D. Mo.) (complaint for third-party liability). • Digital Chocolate v. Zynga, No. 2010-cv-03758 (N.D. Cal.) (use of MAFIA WARS mark). • Information Superbrand v. Fotonauts, No. 91192315 (T.T.A.B.) (application to register FOTOPEDIA). • Avid Life Media v. Marital Affair, No. 2012-cv-07603 (C.D. Cal.) (alleged trade dress infringement). • Keen LLC v. Martin Keen, No. 2005-cv-03796 (N.D. Cal.) (use of KEEN mark). • Bayer v. Rainbow Light Nutritional Systems, No. 91171465 (T.T.A.B.) (registration of MULTILIEVE and SUPRALIEVE marks). • Valent U.S.A. v. Valeant Pharmaceuticals, No. 91165569 (T.T.A.B.) (registration of VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL mark). • Wham-O v. Paramount Pictures, No. 2003-cv-04071 (N.D. Cal.) (use of SLIP-N-SLIDE YELLOW WATER SLIDE). • Namco v. PC Amusements, No. 2003-cv-00365 (M.D. Fla.) (use of MS. PACMAN and GALAGA trademarks). Patent Cases. Facebook. Jeff has also represented Facebook in more than a dozen patent litigation matters, including the successful representation of Facebook in its first jury trial: Leader Tech. v. Facebook, No. 2008-cv-00862 (D. Del.). Other Facebook patent cases include:. • Cross Atlantic Capital Partners v. Facebook, No. 2007-cv-02768 (E.D. Pa.). • Beneficial Innovations v. Facebook, No. 2009-cv-00175 (E.D. Tex.). • WhoGlue Inc. v. Facebook, No. 2009-cv-00705 (D. Del.). • Affinity Labs of Texas v. Facebook, No. 2009-cv-04436 (N.D. Cal.). • SimpleAir v. Facebook, No. 2009-cv-00289 (E.D. Tex.). • Mekiki v. Facebook, No. 2009-cv-00745 (D. Del.). • Tele-Publishing v. Facebook, No. 2009-cv-11686 (D. Mass). • Wireless Ink v. Facebook, No. 2010-cv-01841 (S.D.N.Y). • Interval Licensing v. Facebook, No. 2010-cv-01385 (W.D. Wash.). • Princeton Digital Image Corporation v. Facebook, No. 2011-cv-00400 (E.D. Tex). • Promotional Technologies v. Facebook, No. 2011-cv-03488 (N.D. Tex.). • Yahoo! v. Facebook, No. 2012-cv-01212 (N.D. Cal.). • Bascom Research v. Facebook, No. 2012-cv-06293 (N.D. Cal.). Other Patent Matters. • Technology Development & Licensing v. Comcast, No. 2008-cv-03584 (N.D. Ill.). • Qurio Holdings, Inc. v. Comcast, Case No. 2014-cv-07488 (N.D. Ill.). • Innovative Office Products v. eBay, No. 2010-cv-04487 (E.D. Pa.). • Affinity Labs of Texas v. Nike, No. 2010-cv-05543 (N.D. Cal.). • Applera v. Solexa, No. 2007-cv-02845 (N.D. Cal.). • Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche, No. 2005-cv-04158 (N.D. Cal.). • In re Katz Interactive Call Processing Litigation, No. 07-ml-01816 (C.D. Cal.) (largest patent MDL in U.S. history). • Zenith Electronics Corporation v. Thompson, No. 2006-cv-00017 (E.D. Tex.). Copyright Cases. The bulk of Jeff’s copyright practice consists of confidential counseling on the subjects of avoiding liability for copyright infringement and protecting creative works. Jeff has also litigated several copyright matters, including:. • Epikhin v. Game Insight, Case No. 2014-cv-04383 (N.D. Cal.). • Diascience v. Blue Nile, No. 2008-cv-09751 (S.D.N.Y.). • Star Fabrics v. Stein Mart, No. 2012-cv-01859 (C.D. Cal.). • Valve Corporation v. Vivendi Universal, No. 2002-cv-01683 (W.D. Wash.). • Gemma Redux v. Banana Republic, No. 2010-cv-03568 (S.D.N.Y.)

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.7 out of 5
Not Available
Location: Northfield 60093
Firm: The Law Offices of Brendan R. Appel, LLC

I am a Texas transplant who attended law school here in the Midwest, met the love of my life, and am now a practicing Illinois attorney. I have experience in helping small businesses and homeowners with their legal claims, on both plaintiff and defense-side. I focus on property-related and breach of contract litigation, with a special interest in landlord-tenant law, condominium law, and foreclosure defense. I have written on residential real estate, easements, zoning, eminent domain, and local government law.

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.8 out of 5
Not Available
Location: Northfield 60093
Firm: Franklin Law Group

Craig Capilla is a trial lawyer, concentrating his practice in a wide range of civil litigation, including professional liability and commercial claims. He has successfully defended residential and commercial appraisers and appraisal firms accused of negligence or improper activity in their valuation services. Craig has also represented numerous licensed professionals in state licensing matters, including real estate brokers, real estate appraisers, and medical doctors.. Craig developed his skills as a trial lawyer while working as a staff prosecutor for the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation, where he learned and effectively applied the rules of evidence in trying more than 60 cases while also bringing a high volume of cases to settlement prior to trial. Additionally, Craig has experience in drafting contracts, business agreements, and consulting in corporate governance and formation.. Craig has experience in various state and federal civil litigation matters and administrative hearings before regulatory agencies including: Qui tam defense, civil RICO matters, professional malpractice, construction defect litigation, breach of contract, breach of warranty, mechanics' liens, general tort liability, homeowners' association and landlord/tenant disputes, and professional licensing. He has appeared for clients in a number of jurisdictions throughout Illinois, including various courts in Cook, DuPage, Lake, Carroll, Lee, and Kane counties and the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.. Craig has been a featured speaker on multiple occasions to various professional organizations including:. Education. Craig earned a B.A. from the University of Michigan in 2004, majoring in History and Political Science. He then earned a Juris Doctor from the DePaul University College of Law in 2007.. Craig is authorized to practice law in the State of Illinois and is a member of the trial bar of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.. Craig can be reached at

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.3 out of 5
Not Available
Location: Northfield 60093
Firm: Law Office of Timothy S. Newbold

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.1 out of 5
Not Available
Location: Northfield 60093
Firm: Medline Industries, Lp

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.3 out of 5
Not Available
Location: Winnetka 60093

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.9 out of 5
Not Available
Location: Winnetka 60093

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.1 out of 5
Not Available
Location: Winnetka 60093

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.4 out of 5
Not Available
Location: Northfield 60093
Firm: Medline Industries, Lp

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.3 out of 5
Not Available
Location: Northfield 60093
Firm: Kent A. Heitzinger & Associates

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.3 out of 5
Not Available
Location: Northfield 60093
Firm: Blumenthal Martin A Jd Cpa

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.3 out of 5
Not Available
Location: Northfield 60093
Firm: Franklin Law Group

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.5 out of 5
Not Available
Location: Northfield 60093
Firm: Mauer & Madoff LLC

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.3 out of 5
Not Available
Location: Northfield 60093
Firm: Finocchiaro & Associates

Avvo Rating: Rated 1.0 out of 5
Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.3 out of 5
Not Available
Location: Northfield 60093

Experienced Litigation attorney serving clients in Northfield and surrounding areas.

Avvo Rating: Rated 3.8 out of 5
Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.7 out of 5
Not Available
Location: Winnetka 60093

Experienced Litigation attorney serving clients in Northfield and surrounding areas.

Disclaimer: This content is based on aggregated public information and estimated market trends. It is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.