Top best Construction Lawyers Near me in ZIP 94612
Looking for Construction lawyers near ZIP code 94612 in Oakland, California? Browse experienced attorneys with reviews and ratings.
Construction Lawyers Nearby Oakland 94612 (by distance)
Within 10 miles
(San Francisco Area) 94105 7.2 miles
(San Francisco Area) 94111 7.3 miles
(San Francisco Area) 94104 7.5 miles
(Richmond Area) 94805 9.8 miles
Within 25 miles
(Walnut Creek Area) 94597 13.0 miles
(Walnut Creek Area) 94596 13.7 miles
(San Ramon Area) 94583 15.2 miles
(Danville Area) 94526 15.4 miles
(San Rafael Area) 94901 17.6 miles
(Concord Area) 94520 18.0 miles
FAQs - Construction Lawyers in city Oakland How many Construction lawyers actively serve residents of Oakland, California? Approximately 12 licensed attorneys focus on Construction across Oakland, California. Most matters are filed through the California District Court, where local rules shape timelines and filing steps. What is the typical hourly fee for Construction lawyers in Oakland, California? In Oakland, typical rates range from $247-$358 per hour for Construction. End-to-end case budgets frequently land between $2632 and $7022, depending on hearings and discovery. How long do Construction matters usually take in courts near Oakland? Construction cases in Oakland, California usually take around 4-7 months depending on complexity and the California District Court docket. Which local court most often hears Construction cases for people living in Oakland, California? Residents of Oakland typically see Construction filings handled by the California District Court. Proximity to helps with quick submissions and clerk communications. Do attorneys around offer a free first consultation for Construction? About 62% of firms near ZIP offer a free first consultation for Construction, so you can compare strategy and fit before committing.
111 Construction Lawyers Found Near You
Senior Associate, specializing in complex construction litigation and project intervention (claims avoidance, preparation, and advancement, strategic consultation, and procedural review).. Claims experience includes advancing and/or defending claims (range: $1-50M) of breach of contract (scope interpretation, indemnity, abandonment, and termination), negligence, professional negligence (design, including extra cost and/or delay resulting from defective plans and specifications, owner-directed changes or scope-creep), scheduling delays, construction and design defects, water and mold infiltration, fraud, false claims, and prompt payment issues.. Project experience range includes a $100 million continuing care facility, a $40 million city hall replacement, a $30M military hotel, a $350M OSHPD hospital replacement, and various other small and large projects including football stadiums, process-piping facilities, hospital renovations and new construction, cast-in-place and retail/commercial construction.. Delivery and contracting methods experience includes design-build, design-bid-build, CM-at-risk, lump sum, fixed GMP, multi-prime, pure CM, and fast-track design & construction.. Core services include litigation preparation (all levels and California courts), discovery management, and pre-litigation and/or on-site issue consultation and claims development.. Specialties: Discovery management, factual investigation, and claim development utilizing advanmced discovery methods, including database management for the review of paper and digital records. Certified Trainer: CT Summation
Professional Background. A passion for justice drives me to fight hard for my clients' rights. Over the 25 years I have been practicing law, I have developed skills for handling many types of cases, especially cases involving personal injury (auto, premises liability and products liabilitiy), real estate (contracts, neighbor disputes, nuisances, boundary issues, disabiltiy access, etc.), construction (including design, installation, soils, mold and "indoor air quality" issues) and insurance. I have handled cases in both State and Federal courts throughout California, achieving hundreds of favorable settlements for clients, and when needed, successfully trying cases to verdict.. Justice is based on truth, and truth is found by investigation and discovery. When serving as an advocate, I pride myself with skillfully discovering the facts and evidence that will prove up my clients' position in the case, weaken my opponents' case, and help resolve the case. I carefully research the law applicable to the dispute, and consider the effect of the law on the evidence related to the case. I help my clients understand the range of possible outcomes under the law and facts applicale to their case, preparing them to ultimately make an informed decision about whether to resolve the case at mediation, or take a case to trial or arbitration.. When serving as a mediator, I listen carefully to the statements and arguments made by both sides. I find that parties often start with "extreme" positions based on an assumption that if the matter goes to trial, they will get everything they want. When speaking with litigants, I look for the kernels of information which might help build "common ground" on which to reach a compromise agreement. I also help people realize potential weaknesses in their position, and possible unanticipated or unfavorable results which might occur if the matter was tried to a jury or judge. I find that litigants often have not fully considered the "downside" which could occur if a judge or jury does not fully agree with their point of view. By giving litigants a "neutral evalution" and pointing out possible weak points in their case, I help litigants understand how a mediated resolution which they have the opportunity to craft with the other side is usually preferable to a result which will be decided by a judge or jury over whom they have no control.. As an arbitrator, I conscientiously maintain a respectful, neutral demeanor so that parties feel comfortable that I am giving due consideration to all the arguments and evidence submitted by all sides before making a decision. I work hard to assure that the atmosphere of the arbitration remains professional, discouraging bickering between parties and counsel which can lead to unnecessary stress and agitation. Once the evidence is in, I promptly render an award based on my findings after considering all the evidence and arguments.. Personal Information. I am as passionate about life as I am about getting great results for my clients.. In the time when I am not working hard for my clients, I enjoy being active, including biking, tennis, kayaking, hiking with my dogs and almost any outdoor activity. I also enjoy art, spending many quiet hours drawing, painting and writing, mostly for the enjoyment of my family and friends.. I find that taking this quiet time gives me time to reflect even more about the needs of my clients and I often incorporate "inspirations" from my personal time into the strategies I use in my clients' cases.
Kime Smith is an experienced Bay Area litigator with over a decade of experience defending construction entities. Mr. Smith’s legal experience includes the areas of construction defect, personal injury, and complex toxic torts.. Mr. Smith represents a diverse client base including general contractors, subcontractors, product manufacturers and construction material suppliers. Mr. Smith has extensive law and motion experience and deposition experience defending San Francisco and Los Angeles based entities.. At Syracuse University College of Law, Mr. Smith received Dean’s List honors and received a certificate from the Technology Management Program where he assessed university based inventions for intellectual property protection. During the summer of 2002, Mr. Smith studied Chinese intellectual property law at the prestigious TsinghaiUniversity in Beijing, China.. Mr. Smith is an active member of the San Francisco Aquarium Society, the oldest organization of its type in America.
Jim Butler handles cases of career ending injuries in personal injury, workers compensation and social security cases. He represents members of many of the building trades; electricians, carpenters, laborers, boilermakers etc. Jim is a past president of the San Francisco Trial Lawyers Association, and currently serves as president of the California Applicant's Attorneys Association. He has been recognized as being in the top 5% of practicing attorneys in Northern California by Superlawyers yearly since 2006. Jim is AV Preeminent rated by Martindale Hubbell. This is the highest possible rating for Legal Ability and Ethical Standards. He is a certified specialist in Worker's Compensation. Jim's focus is on litigation, legislation and education. Jim frequentlly teaches other lawyers on a variety of subjects, and also lectures frequently before labor unions on rights and remedies availible to injured workers.. Jim has practiced at his own firm since 2009. Previously he was a trial team leader at the Veen Firm (1987-2009), and practiced with the Legal Aid Society of Alameda County (1982-1987).
Jeff Brence has broad experience in civil litigation, including construction, employment law, unlawful detainer actions, real estate contract disputes, and litigating probate matters.. Mr. Brence has represented numerous clients including general contractors, subcontractors, real estate developers, and real estate purchasers. Mr. Brence has experience in law and motion, has drafted several successful summary judgment motions, and has filed briefs in the California Court of Appeals.. Prior to coming to California in 2009, Mr. Brence studied at the University of Colorado and spent his weekends teaching skiing.. Mr. Brence is a member of the San FranciscoCounty and San Mateo County Bar Associations, and is licensed to practice in California.
In addition to the practice of law, I am active in several non-profit organizations. I was on the Head Royce School Board of Trustees for 13 years and served as President of the Claremont Country Club. The experience with these organizations have enhanced my practice in many ways as I have had to deal with critical issues.
Garret is a partner at Nomos LLP in Oakland, California where he specializes in construction, real estate and related business disputes.. The son of an architect, Garret grew up around blueprints and drafting tables. And, while he didn’t follow in his father’s footsteps he didn’t stray far either. He worked as a lobbyist in Sacramento and later Washington, D.C. where he represented the design profession and construction industry before the California state legislature, Congress and executive bodies including the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.. Since then, Garret’s practice has focused almost exclusively on construction, real estate and related business disputes. He has represented owners, developers, architects, engineers, general contractors, subcontractors, material suppliers and sureties from contract negotiations through trial on numerous public and private projects from state-of-the-art solar projects to the most iconic landmarks in the state including the Golden Gate Bridge.. Recognized as a Rising Star in the area of construction litigation in Thompson Reuter’s annual list of Northern California Super Lawyers, Garret has written and spoken before many of the leading construction organizations in the state and is a contributing author on topics related to construction law for the Continuing Education of the Bar sponsored by the State Bar of California and published by the University of California.. Garret is also the author of the California Construction Law Blog () which provides an informative yet wry look at legal issues affecting the California construction industry.
Eric Firstman is a Principal with Meyers Nave and the head of the Construction and Facilities Practice Group. He focuses his practice on construction litigation, construction project planning, procurement of professional services and contractors, regulatory compliance and facilities plans.. Before joining Meyers Nave, Eric was a Principal at a Construction and Real Estate Law firm in Northern California, where he handled large public and private construction and development matters, complex construction litigation, and virtually every aspect of design and construction projects.. Eric is a Fellow of the Litigation Counsel of America, a trial lawyer honorary society limited to the top .5% of trial lawyers, and is AV rated by Martindale-Hubbell for reaching the height of professional excellence and the highest levels of skill and integrity.
Connie Chadwick utilizes her personal and professional experience and combines the best of both worlds in the construction field and the law. Ms. Chadwick presently focuses her law practice on construction dispute mediation. Connie is a Tennessee licensed residential general contractor (retired 2024*) with over fifteen years of experience in the construction field. With both legal and construction experience, Connie is a logical choice for contractor disputes. Connie earned her Doctorate of Jurisprudence from The Nashville School of Law after earning her Bachelor of Science in Accounting and Finance from Lipscomb University and is a Tennessee Rule 31 Civil Mediator.. Connie is a seasoned business professional who transitioned to the legal profession in 2014 with an intense drive to achieve and deliver results for her clients. Connie has strong management expertise and ability to oversee diverse objectives and challenging deadlines with a sense of confidence and commitment. With more than 25 years of experience in small business and entrepreneurial organizations within the banking, construction and real estate industries, Connie brings a diverse skill set to the table. She is extremely detailed-oriented with excellent research, investigative, and communication skills.. Connie Chadwick is an attorney who mediates cases in the entire Tennessee area either in person or by zoom. Connie Chadwick is recognized by peers and was selected to Rising Stars for 2017 - 2025. This selection is based off of an evaluation of 12 indicators including peer recognition and professional achievement in legal practice. Being selected to Rising Stars is limited to a small number of attorneys in each state. As one of the few attorneys to garner the distinction of Rising Stars, Connie Chadwick has earned the respect of peers as one of the top-rated attorneys in the nation.
Catherine Chen currently focuses her practice on construction defect litigation where she defends contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers of construction materials in suits filed in Northern California. Ms. Chen draws from her extensive knowledge and experience as a litigator, and is involved with all aspects of case development, including all phases of discovery and law & motion practice.. Ms. Chen’s background includes wide-ranging knowledge of other areas of law as she practiced in the Toxic Torts group with her prior employment with McKenna, Long & Aldridge, and during her employment with Fox, Shjeflo, Wohl & Hartley, she was involved with estate planning, real estate transactions, and corporation formation.
After graduating high school in the East Bay, David Kleczek attended the University of Illinois at Champaign/Urbana. Active in the school CEDA Debate Team, the school ranked in the top 20 nationally. After obtaining a bachelor degree in Economics, Mr. Kleczek moved to Chicago. In 2002, Mr. Kleczek graduated with honors from The John Marshall Law School. During his law school tenure, Mr. Kleczek was appointed to the Moot Court Executive Board.. Mr. Kleczek began work as an associate at Levenfeld Pearlstein, LP Legal, downtown Chicago, Illinois, where he had worked as an intern prior to graduation. After several years at LP Legal, Mr. Kleczek opened his own practice. In 2008, Mr. Kleczek returned to the East Bay, and operates Kleczek Law Office from its Downtown Oakland Offices. Since returning to the East Bay, David Kleczek has continued his successful representation of those wronged.
Experienced Construction attorney serving clients in Oakland and surrounding areas.
Experienced Construction attorney serving clients in Oakland and surrounding areas.