Showing top 10 Business attorneys
in Phoenix, Arizona near ZIP code 85016.
Click any pin to view lawyer details, ratings, and contact information.
Gold pins indicate top-rated lawyers.
Business Case Statistics Overview
Business Case Timeline
Business case timelines in Phoenix typically range from 4 to 18 months, depending on case complexity, court schedules, and whether the matter settles early or proceeds to trial.
Phoenix Court Backlog
Court backlog for business-related cases in Maricopa County fluctuates, with low periods around 80 cases and high periods reaching up to 250, influenced by filing surges and judicial resources.
Business Phoenix Filing Volume
Estimated monthly business case filings in Phoenix range from 40 to 90, reflecting trends in commercial disputes, contract issues, and local economic activity.
Business Case Outcomes
Approximately 55% of business disputes resolve pre-litigation, 35% after filing but before trial, and about 15% reach a verdict at trial, based on public settlement patterns.
FAQs - Business Lawyers in 85016 city Phoenix
How many Administrative ,Antitrust & Trade Regulation,Arbitration,Business ,Civil ,Corporate ,Government Contracts,Intellectual Property ,Labor ,Lender ,Mediation,Real Estate ,Securities lawyers actively serve residents of Phoenix, Arizona (85016)?
Approximately 65 licensed attorneys focus on Administrative ,Antitrust & Trade Regulation,Arbitration,Business ,Civil ,Corporate ,Government Contracts,Intellectual Property ,Labor ,Lender ,Mediation,Real Estate ,Securities across Phoenix, Arizona (85016). Most matters are filed through the Arizona District Court, where local rules shape timelines and filing steps.
How long do Administrative ,Antitrust & Trade Regulation,Arbitration,Business ,Civil ,Corporate ,Government Contracts,Intellectual Property ,Labor ,Lender ,Mediation,Real Estate ,Securities matters usually take in courts near Phoenix (85016)?
Administrative ,Antitrust & Trade Regulation,Arbitration,Business ,Civil ,Corporate ,Government Contracts,Intellectual Property ,Labor ,Lender ,Mediation,Real Estate ,Securities cases in Phoenix, Arizona usually take around 4-9 months depending on complexity and the Arizona District Court docket.
Which local court most often hears Administrative ,Antitrust & Trade Regulation,Arbitration,Business ,Civil ,Corporate ,Government Contracts,Intellectual Property ,Labor ,Lender ,Mediation,Real Estate ,Securities cases for people living in Phoenix, Arizona?
Residents of Phoenix typically see Administrative ,Antitrust & Trade Regulation,Arbitration,Business ,Civil ,Corporate ,Government Contracts,Intellectual Property ,Labor ,Lender ,Mediation,Real Estate ,Securities filings handled by the Arizona District Court. Proximity to 85016 helps with quick submissions and clerk communications.
Do attorneys around 85016 offer a free first consultation for Administrative ,Antitrust & Trade Regulation,Arbitration,Business ,Civil ,Corporate ,Government Contracts,Intellectual Property ,Labor ,Lender ,Mediation,Real Estate ,Securities?
About 64% of firms near ZIP 85016 offer a free first consultation for Administrative ,Antitrust & Trade Regulation,Arbitration,Business ,Civil ,Corporate ,Government Contracts,Intellectual Property ,Labor ,Lender ,Mediation,Real Estate ,Securities, so you can compare strategy and fit before committing.
Stephen Biggs focuses his practice on appellate work, preventing and solving business disputes, and protecting the reputation and intellectual property of individuals and businesses.. Appellate Practice. Stephen assists individuals, businesses, and other lawyers in appealing a ruling from one court to a higher court and in defending against appeals taken by opposing parties. His appellate experience includes cases involving many different areas of the law, including business and commercial disputes, questions of statutory interpretation, issues regarding the enforceability of contractual provisions, criminal matters, defamation claims, and unemployment insurance benefits—to name a few.. Most frequently, clients and other lawyers hire Stephen to assist them in bringing direct and intermediate appeals (incluidng special actions) before the Arizona Court of Appeals. But Stephen has also prepared multiple petitions for review to the Arizona Supreme Court, and he has briefed and argued two cases accepted for review by that court. Stephen also has experience briefing and arguing cases in the federal courts of appeal, and he has assisted or consulted with other lawyers in pursuing and defending appeals before appellate courts in states outside of Arizona.. Preventing and Solving Business Disputes. Stephen helps individuals and businesses avoid and solve disputes, both before and after they become lawsuits. Effective risk management (including seeking the advice of a lawyer about how to prevent and protect against legal problems before they occur) and early negotiation to resolve problems that do arise before they become lawsuits can oftentimes keep individuals and businesses out of court and avoid the costs of litigation. But when litigation is necessary or a court action has already been filed, Stephen assists businesses and individuals in pursuing or defending against legal claims in court or in arbitration.. Some examples of the types of problems and situations that Stephen helps his clients avoid or address include contract disputes, unfair competition, disclosure of confidential information, fraud claims (including claims for consumer fraud, securities fraud, and other forms of investment fraud), business management disputes (including claims for breach of fiduciary duty, self-dealing, or disloyalty against officers, directors, and other managers of businesses), business ownership disputes (including business break-ups), failed business deals, trust disputes, and professional negligence (including malpractice claims against accountants, auditors, and lawyers).. Protecting and Defending Reputations and Intellectual Property. Your good name matters, whether you are an individual or a business. In the age of the Internet, it is easier than ever for harmful, negative statements to be communicated to large audiences instantaneously. Stephen assists individuals and businesses in protecting their reputation when others defame, slander, or libel them. He also assists those who have been accused of defamation, slander, or libel in defending against those claims.. In addition to reputation, another valuable asset of every business and entrepreneur is intellectual property. Stephen assists individuals and businesses in pursuing and defending against claims of trade secret misappropriation, copyright infringement, trademark infringement, Lanham Act violations, and other forms of unfair competition related to intellectual property rights (including palming off and passing off claims).
Richard C. Gramlich focuses his practice on Business, Real Estate and Construction Litigation, Insurance Bad Faith, Personal Injury, Wrongful Death, and Product Liability. He routinely represents business owners in business disputes, contractors and owners in construction defect, non-pay/stop-pay claims, delay claims, professional negligence, Registrar of Contractor’s hearings, and general breach of contract claims. He has also earned a reputation for successfully representing consumers against their insurance companies. Mr. Gramlich was the lead counsel for the Scottsdale “W” Hotel’s construction defect and delay claim. Mr. Gramlich achieved the largest per home verdicts in Arizona for damage caused by expansive He has successfully tried Business Tort, Personal Injury, Product Liability, and Insurance Bad Faith actions resulting in significant recoveries, and has earned the nickname “Bulldog” by many of his clients.. Mr. Gramlich graduated from the University of Arizona in Business Administration, Finance and Real Estate, Cum Laude, in 1989 and from the Arizona State University College of Law, in the top third of his class, in 1992. He has been practicing law for the last 28 years in both State and Federal Court.
With nearly 15 years of business management, credit &
asset evaluation and legal experience in the financial services sector Tricia
has become a skilled innovative thinker. She is good at working with
business owners because she understands how they work. She will provide thoughtful strategic planning built on the specific
organizational objectives. As an attorney, and business professional with a
Masters in Business Administration, she has the ability to comprehend complex
business and legal concepts and then effectively communicate matters to a broad
audience.. Her experience in both the legal and business arena gives
her a broad understanding of numerous financial and legal implications
encountered in business and which she can communicate in a fluent manner with
business and legal professionals alike.. Prior to becoming a lawyer, Tricia supported the
substantial growth of a wholesale residential mortgage branch as Operations
Manager. As Director of Credit for a large wholesale mortgage
originator she developed and implemented
credit policy & procedure guidance enterprise wide. She focused on
qualitative analysis of loan conformity and regulatory compliance in her roles
as Director of Underwriting and as a Due Diligence Auditor.. Tricia is knowledgeable of regulatory agencies and
applicable finance laws with a focus on Dodd Frank and CFPB policy. She has in
depth experience with residential mortgage and consumer credit practices. She
has successfully handled modifications, deed-in-lieu transfers and consumer
rights claims on mortgage transactions. Tricia has been involved in
landlord tenant transactions and HOA disputes and understands the various
issues that can arise.. Tricia’s passion for smart, equitable solutions is foremost
in all her endeavors.
2375 East Camelback Road , PHOENIX , Arizona 85016
Practice Areas: Immigration, Business, Intellectual Property
Matthew Apfel specializes in immigration, intellectual property, public international law, international arbitration and investment disputes, international business transactions and civil suits against foreign sovereign states in domestic courts. His work has led him to live in Beijing, New York City, Washington, D.C and Phoenix.. Because of his studies, interest and knowledge, Apfel is also a specialist on China especially focused on related trade and legal issues. He is a member of the Washington based China Hands Group.. He is a member of the New York, District of Columbia and Arizona Bars and is admitted as an attorney-counselor before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.. Apfel has written numerous papers, articles and comments on various public and private international legal issues and has contributed to , an international trade law/customs law website and blog.. A native of Arizona, Matthew Apfel received his Bachelor of Arts degree in International Affairs with a focus in Chinese politics from George Washington University (GWU) in 2005. While at GWU, he attended Pembroke College, Cambridge University in the United Kingdom where he studied modern Chinese history. He subsequently earned his Juris Doctor degree from George Washington University Law School (GW Law) in 2008. While at GW Law, Apfel was active at various levels in the International Law Society and Student Intellectual Property Association.. He has experience working at the US Senate, Canadian Embassy, Asia Society and the CATO Institute in Washington, DC. In 2005, he clerked at the Office of the Legal Advisor at the US Department of State where he assisted in the formulation of private international legal treaties in banking and secured transactions at the Private International Law section. Apfel also currently serves as General Counsel to American World Clinics, a startup company which is building and operating medical clinics abroad.. He is fluent in Spanish and conversational in Mandarin Chinese.
Disclaimer: This content is based on aggregated public information and estimated market trends. It is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
