Top Medical Malpractice Lawyers in ZIP 92706 | 1 available

1 Medical Malpractice lawyers are available in ZIP code 92706 in Santa Ana, California, including Benjamin Ikuta. Average rating of these lawyers is 4.2/5 and 66% provide free consultation.

Medical Malpractice Lawyers Near ZIP 92706 - Map View

Showing top 1 Medical Malpractice attorneys in Santa Ana, California near ZIP code 92706. Click any pin to view lawyer details, ratings, and contact information. Gold pins indicate top-rated lawyers.


FAQs - Medical Malpractice Lawyers in 92706 city Santa Ana How many Legal Malpractice,Medical Malpractice lawyers actively serve residents of Santa Ana, California (92706)? Approximately 57 licensed attorneys focus on Legal Malpractice,Medical Malpractice across Santa Ana, California (92706). Most matters are filed through the California District Court, where local rules shape timelines and filing steps. How long do Legal Malpractice,Medical Malpractice matters usually take in courts near Santa Ana (92706)? Legal Malpractice,Medical Malpractice cases in Santa Ana, California usually take around 5-9 months depending on complexity and the California District Court docket. Which local court most often hears Legal Malpractice,Medical Malpractice cases for people living in Santa Ana, California? Residents of Santa Ana typically see Legal Malpractice,Medical Malpractice filings handled by the California District Court. Proximity to 92706 helps with quick submissions and clerk communications. Do attorneys around 92706 offer a free first consultation for Legal Malpractice,Medical Malpractice? About 51% of firms near ZIP 92706 offer a free first consultation for Legal Malpractice,Medical Malpractice, so you can compare strategy and fit before committing.
Avvo Rating: Rated 4.2 out of 5

Benjamin Ikuta

Firm: Ikuta Hemesath, LLP
1327 N Broadway , Santa Ana , California 92706
Practice Areas: Medical Malpractice
Benjamin T. Ikuta is an attorney who joined Hodes Milman Liebeck, LLP in 2016.  Ben focuses on nursing home negligence, elder abuse, personal injury and product liability.  For eight years prior to working at Hodes Milman Liebeck, LLP, Ben worked for firms that primarily focused on defending skilled nursing facilities, residential care facilities for the elderly, hospitals, physicians, and nurses. He defended elder abuse, malpractice, and employment-related actions.. In October of 2012, Ben was the second-chair for a trial in defending a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (“RCFE”) in an elder abuse case.  The RCFE had served grade D commercial steak to its residents.  After an 85-year old resident choked on the meat, the staff at the RCFE failed to call for the paramedics for approximately 20 minutes, resulting in the elder’s death.  After a 6-week trial, where Ben cross-examined the elder’s family, the meat manufacturers and distributers, and an expert doctor, the jury returned a unanimous verdict in favor of Ben’s client.  In another case, Ben defended a registered nurse accused of sexual misconduct in an administrative hearing and received a favorable result of probation.  As a defense lawyer prior to joining Hodes Milman Liebeck, LLP, Ben routinely secured judgments in favor of healthcare providers and insurance companies.. In 2016, Ben realized that his true calling was not in defending healthcare providers and insurance companies, but rather to work for those injured by wrongdoing.  This was particularly true for vulnerable and defenseless elders in claims of reckless neglect against RCFEs, Skilled Nursing Facilities, and Hospitals. Ben’s extensive experience with defense firms provides him a unique perspective in relation to the tactics and strategies implemented by insurance companies, corporations, and defense attorneys. This experience from the other side of the table allows Ben to represent plaintiffs more effectively and obtain the best possible results.. Education. Ben received his Bachelor of Science in Mathematics and his Bachelor of Arts in Economics from UCLA. Ben earned his Juris Doctorate from the University of California, Hastings College of Law, where he served as Symposium Editor of the Hastings Law Journal. During law school, Mr. Ikuta made significant contributions to the public sector, providing research and recommendations for the Judicial Council of California and the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission.. Publications. Honors. Recent Results. March 23, 2018 - $200,000 recovery after a patient fell at a Senior Mental Health Unit, fracturing her left hip and shoulder.. March 5, 2018: $225,000 recovery surrounding the death of a 66-year old man who bled to death in a hospital.. January 29, 2018: $1,500,000 settlement after physicians at a hospital failed to properly diagnose the patient with adrenal insufficiency, resulting in brain damage.. January 22, 2018: $180,000 recovery in a case where Ben’s clients were rear-ended, suffering back pain and discomfort but no need for surgery.  The case settled after the insurance company increased their offer after hearing Ben’s opening statement in front of the jury.. December 13, 2017: $2,499,000 settlement involving a slip-and-fall case against an urgent care center resulting in a severe hematoma and brain damage.. December 5, 2017 - $3,000,000 settlement of a baby who was brain damaged at a hospital after a NICU nurse failed to recognize the symptoms of a bacterial infection.. November 21, 2017 - $137,500 result against an HMO due to the failure to diagnose skin cancer, resulting in an unsightly excision.. November 6, 2017 - $195,000 resolution involving a slip and fall at a Skilled Nursing Facility, resulting in a broken femur.. July 26, 2017 – Trial court award of full ownership of an Orange County home.  Ben’s client was both the defendant and cross-plaintiff in a countersuit involving the purchase of a house in Orange County.  Ben prevailed at a bench trial, obtaining not only a defense award but also prevailed on the cross-complaint for full ownership of the home.. February 2, 2017: $150,000 recovery in a failure to identify breast cancer in a mammogram against a radiologist.  The case settled after Ben prevailed after the first part of a two-part trial as to whether his client’s case was timely filed.
1

You have reached the Last Page!

Disclaimer: This content is based on aggregated public information and estimated market trends. It is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.