Top LItigation Lawyers in Alpharetta | 4 available

4 LItigation lawyers are available in Alpharetta, Georgia, including Chuck Gabriel, Dana Dayagi, Nicholas Hollander, and Scott Stevens. These lawyers are rated between 4.7/5 to 5.0/5 and 54% provide free consultation.
Chuck Gabriel LItigation Lawyer Chuck Gabriel Dana Dayagi LItigation Lawyer Dana Dayagi Nicholas Hollander LItigation Lawyer Nicholas Holla Scott Stevens LItigation Lawyer Scott Stevens
Chuck Gabriel
View Profile
Avvo Rating: Rated 5.0 out of 5

Chuck Gabriel

Firm: Chalmers, Pak, Burch & Adams, LLC
5755 North Point Parkway , Alpharetta , Georgia 30022
Practice Areas: Business, Lawsuits & Disputes, Litigation, Class Action
I am a civil trial attorney with a long track record of accomplishments. I was admitted in Georgia in 2000 and in New York in 1974. I am a retired FBI Agent (1973-2002) and peer-rated AV-Preeminent by Martindale Hubbell.. The focus of my practice is Business Litigation including ownership disputes, fraud, employee/officer/director misconduct, breach of contract, vendor disputes and trade secret misappropriation.. In addition, I have a history of forming or joining highly capable teams of litigators from around the country when appropriate to deal with the more complex matters, successfully investigating and building class action cases and federal False Claims/Qui Tam whistle-blower actions, and then successfully resolving them.
Avvo Review
“Counselor Gabriel was considerate, professional and was willing to listen all aspects of my case. He”
Read on Avvo
Dana Dayagi
View Profile
Avvo Rating: Rated 5.0 out of 5

Dana Dayagi

Firm: Lueder, Larkin & Hunter
5900 Windward Parkway , Alpharetta , Georgia 30005
Practice Areas: Litigation, Car Accident, Defective Products, Wrongful Death
Avvo Review
“genuinely cared about my well-being after the collision and her dedication to go the extra mile for”
Read on Avvo
Lawyers.com Review
“Dana and I have worked together on cases before. She is knowledgeable, hardworking, and prompt to get back to clients. What is especially impressive, is her ability to relate to cl…”
Nicholas Hollander
View Profile

Nicholas Hollander

Firm: Cuzdey, Ehrmann, Wagner, Stine & Sansalone LLC
3775 Mansell Rd , Alpharetta , Georgia 30022
Practice Areas: Litigation
Lawyers.com Review
“I endorse this lawyer. Nick is one of the most knowledgeable and tenacious attorneys I know.”
Scott Stevens
View Profile
Avvo Rating: Rated 4.8 out of 5

Scott Stevens

Firm: Howe Law Firm, ph. 678.551.6617
4385 Kimball Bridge Road, Ste 100 , Alpharetta , Georgia 30022
Practice Areas: Litigation, Landlord & Tenant, Bankruptcy, Appeals
AV Preeminent Rating Martindale Hubbell, Practice: commercial litigation, HOA/Condo law, landlord tenant, construction law, post-judgment collection, Appeals.  Admitted to practice in all federal courts in GA, Northern District, Middle District, and Southern District.  Admitted to 11th Circuit US Court of Appeals.  Admitted to practice in all federal courts in TN, Eastern District, Middle District, and Western District.. Reported cases. LM Insurance Corp. v. London, 2023 Ga. App. Lexis 232 (2023);  Blount v. College Glen Condominium, A21A626, GA Court of Appeals, (2021)  Brancewicz v. SMS Financial, P, LLC, 2021 Ga. App. Lexis 433, (2021); Blakemore v. Dirt Movers, Inc., 344 Ga. App. 238 (2018), CEI Services v. Sosebee, 344 Ga. App. 508 (2018), Monolith Companies LLC v. Hunter Douglas Hospitality, 333 Ga. App. 898 (2015), Governors Towne Club v. J. W. Thomason, 2011 Ga. App. Lexis 131 (2011); Southway Crane & Rigging v. Federal Insurance Co., 294 Ga. App. 504 (2008); Graham v. Casa Investment Co., 274 Ga. App. 59 (2005); KAR Printing v. Pierce 276 Ga. App. 511 (2005); In Re: Buchanan, 273 Bankr. 749 (Bankr. MD of GA 2002)
Avvo Review
“e only reason. For much of the case, there was no who, what, and why reflected by each charge. To”
Read on Avvo
1

You have reached the Last Page!

Disclaimer: This content is based on aggregated public information and estimated market trends. It is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.