Top Labor Lawyers in ZIP 01060 | 1 available

1 Labor lawyers are available in ZIP code 01060 in Northampton, Massachusetts, including Amy Beth Royal. Average rating of these lawyers is 3.4/5 and 64% provide free consultation.

Labor Lawyers Near ZIP 01060 - Map View

Showing top 1 Labor attorneys in Northampton, Massachusetts near ZIP code 01060. Click any pin to view lawyer details, ratings, and contact information. Gold pins indicate top-rated lawyers.


FAQs - Labor Lawyers in 01060 city Northampton How many Civil , Civil Rights, Criminal Defense , Labor lawyers actively serve residents of Northampton, Massachusetts (01060)? Approximately 55 licensed attorneys focus on Civil , Civil Rights, Criminal Defense , Labor across Northampton, Massachusetts (01060). Most matters are filed through the Massachusetts District Court, where local rules shape timelines and filing steps. How long do Civil , Civil Rights, Criminal Defense , Labor matters usually take in courts near Northampton (01060)? Civil , Civil Rights, Criminal Defense , Labor cases in Northampton, Massachusetts usually take around 5-9 months depending on complexity and the Massachusetts District Court docket. Which local court most often hears Civil , Civil Rights, Criminal Defense , Labor cases for people living in Northampton, Massachusetts? Residents of Northampton typically see Civil , Civil Rights, Criminal Defense , Labor filings handled by the Massachusetts District Court. Proximity to 01060 helps with quick submissions and clerk communications. Do attorneys around 01060 offer a free first consultation for Civil , Civil Rights, Criminal Defense , Labor? About 37% of firms near ZIP 01060 offer a free first consultation for Civil , Civil Rights, Criminal Defense , Labor, so you can compare strategy and fit before committing.
Avvo Rating: Rated 3.4 out of 5

Amy Beth Royal

Firm: Royal, P.C.
270 Pleasant Street , Northampton , Massachusetts 01060
Practice Areas: Employment & Labor , Labor , Employment & Labor, Employment & Labor
Amy is the founder and Chief Executive Officer of Royal.  She has over sixteen years of experience in private and public sector employer-side representation.  Amy began her legal career as an Assistant Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts where she defended the Commonwealth in complex civil litigation matters.  Amy has also served as a judicial extern for the Honorable Lawrence E. Kahn in the United States District Court, Northern District of New York and was employed by the City of Springfield in its Law Department.. Upon entering private practice, Amy concentrated in company-side labor and employment law.  Over the course of her career, Amy has successfully defended employers in federal and state courts as well as before administrative agencies in a variety of areas of employment law, including employment discrimination and sexual harassment, unfair competition, breach of contract and wrongful discharge claims, workers' compensation, and Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) violations, with a special emphasis in wage and hour class actions.  Amy has assisted employers with unionized workforces during contract negotiations, at arbitrations, and with respect to employee grievances and unfair labor practice charges.  She provides regular counsel to clients on general workplace matters, performs preventive work such as wage and hour law compliance, recordkeeping audits, and management training, and drafts contracts, employee manuals and affirmative action plans.  Amy also advises non-union clients on maintaining a union-free workplace.. Amy is a frequent speaker at a wide variety of business associations and organizations and has authored innumerable articles on employment-related legal topics.  She is also the author of “The Parameters of the Substantial Justification Test as Established by the Supreme Court in Lunding v. New York Tax Appeals Tribunal,” 63 Alb. L. Rev. 657 (1999).
1

You have reached the Last Page!

Disclaimer: This content is based on aggregated public information and estimated market trends. It is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.