Firm: Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease LLP
Practice Areas: Litigation
Contact: Not Available
Firm: Lori Whitten Law LLC
Practice Areas: Litigation
Contact: Not Available
Firm: Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease LLP
Practice Areas: Litigation
Contact: Not Available
Firm: Sullivan Law Office
Practice Areas: Litigation
Contact: Not Available
Practice Areas: Litigation
Contact: Not Available
Firm: Thacker Martinsek LPA
Practice Areas: Litigation
Marguerite practices in the areas of litigation management and insurance recovery.. She coordinates discovery nationally in products liability litigation for a major manufacturer. She is responsible for preparing discovery motions, negotiating protective orders, preparing discovery responses, and gathering responsive documents. Marguerite has also assisted in the restructuring of a national network of defense counsel and developing document-retention policies and procedures for protecting trade secrets. Marguerite has experience representing both corporations and individuals in various coverage disputes.. Marguerite received a Bachelor of Science degree magna cum laude in Business Administration and English from Westminster College in 1998 and a law degree cum laude from Case Western Reserve University School of Law in 2001. She is a member of the Order of the Coif.
Contact: Not Available
Firm: Thrasher, Dinsmore & Dolan LPA
Practice Areas: Litigation
He was previously a partner with the law firm of Porter Wright Morris & Arthur. His experience includes serving as coordinating counsel for a Fortune 100 company handling litigation throughout the United States and has worked with various public entities- including serving as special counsel to the Ohio Turnpike Commission.. Leo is recognized litigator in Ohio and has handled litigation throughout the United States on behalf of corporate clients. He obtained a jury verdict in excess of $8 million dollars after a month-long trial in the Northern District of Ohio on a breach of contract case. In addition, he obtained a judgment on behalf of a note holder against borrowers and guarantors in excess of $6.3 million. During the trial, Leo was able to establish the guarantors’ liability by triggering the “bad boy” carve out provisions in the guarantee— even though the loan documents were “non-recourse.” As the result of the trial, Leo obtained an additional judgment on behalf of the note holder in excess of $4.6 million against the guarantor of a lease assigned as collateral.. He successfully argued before the Court of Appeals of Ohio, 8th Appellate District, Chang v. Cleveland Clinic Found. (2003), 2003 Ohio 6167, which in 2002 was recognized as the defense verdict of the year by the Defense Research Institute.
Contact: Not Available
Firm: Krugliak Wilkins Griffiths Dougherty Co.
Practice Areas: Litigation
Contact: +1 (330) 752-8308
Firm: Supreme Court of Ohio
Practice Areas: Litigation
Contact: Not Available
Practice Areas: Litigation
Contact: Not Available
Firm: Ohio Department of Transportation
Practice Areas: Litigation
Contact: Not Available
Firm: Louis F. Kort Co., L.P.A.
Practice Areas: Litigation
Contact: Not Available
Firm: The Lydia Floyd Law Firm, LLC
Practice Areas: Litigation
Contact: Not Available
Firm: Cleveland State University
Practice Areas: Litigation
Contact: Not Available
Firm: Taft Stettinius & Hollister, LLP
Practice Areas: Litigation
Contact: Not Available
Firm: Nasa Glenn Research Center
Practice Areas: Litigation
Contact: Not Available
Firm: Wickens Herzer Panza Cook & Batista Co.
Practice Areas: Litigation
Contact: Not Available
Firm: Lamonica Coleman & Martello
Practice Areas: Litigation
Contact: Not Available
Firm: Jones Day
Practice Areas: Litigation
Contact: Not Available
Practice Areas: Litigation
Contact: Not Available