Top Estate Planning Lawyers in ZIP 29412 | 1 available

1 Estate Planning lawyers are available in ZIP code 29412 in Charleston, South Carolina, including Cynthia O'Dell. Average rating of these lawyers is 1.0/5 and 56% provide free consultation.

Estate Planning Lawyers Near ZIP 29412 - Map View

Showing top 1 Estate Planning attorneys in Charleston, South Carolina near ZIP code 29412. Click any pin to view lawyer details, ratings, and contact information. Gold pins indicate top-rated lawyers.


FAQs - Estate Planning Lawyers in 29412 city Charleston How many Estate Planning, Real Estate, Litigation lawyers actively serve residents of Charleston, South Carolina (29412)? Approximately 36 licensed attorneys focus on Estate Planning, Real Estate, Litigation across Charleston, South Carolina (29412). Most matters are filed through the South Carolina District Court, where local rules shape timelines and filing steps. How long do Estate Planning, Real Estate, Litigation matters usually take in courts near Charleston (29412)? Estate Planning, Real Estate, Litigation cases in Charleston, South Carolina usually take around 4-10 months depending on complexity and the South Carolina District Court docket. Which local court most often hears Estate Planning, Real Estate, Litigation cases for people living in Charleston, South Carolina? Residents of Charleston typically see Estate Planning, Real Estate, Litigation filings handled by the South Carolina District Court. Proximity to 29412 helps with quick submissions and clerk communications. Do attorneys around 29412 offer a free first consultation for Estate Planning, Real Estate, Litigation? About 68% of firms near ZIP 29412 offer a free first consultation for Estate Planning, Real Estate, Litigation, so you can compare strategy and fit before committing.
Avvo Rating: Rated 1.0 out of 5

Cynthia O'Dell

Firm: The Law Firm of Cynthia O'Dell, PC.
102 Wappoo Creek Drive , Charleston , South Carolina 29412
Practice Areas: Estate Planning
Avvo Review
“Vague and does not document services very well. Says unethical statements and has both misrepresente”
Read on Avvo
1

You have reached the Last Page!

Disclaimer: This content is based on aggregated public information and estimated market trends. It is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.