Lawbamba

Top best Consumer Protection Lawyers in zip code 02139 Cambridge

Home   ➤ Massachusetts   ➤➤ Zip- 02139 - Cambridge - Consumer Protection

We have more than 3 top best Consumer Protection lawyers in zip code 02139, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Jeffrey M. Feuer, Lee D. Goldstein are among the top best Consumer Protection attorneys in zip code 02139. While choosing lawyers in zip code 02139, compare their reviews.


Jeffrey M. Feuer - top best Consumer Protection Lawyer in zip code 02139

Jeffrey M. Feuer

Rating: 1


Area of Practice: Business & Commercial,Constitutional ,Consumer Protection,Contracts,Employment & Labor ,Landlord & Tenant,Lemon ,Motor Vehicle Accidents,Personal Injury,Premises Liability,Toxic Substances

Zip code: 02139, Cambridge, Massachusetts

Jeffrey M. Feuer Avvo Reviews
He charged me three times for the one single letter, the same letter because he wanted to add something to it! I didn't ask for it!! He over charged a... ...

Contact: (617) 492-8473
Goldstein and Feuer.
702   678 Avenue Massachuset.

Lee D. Goldstein - top best Consumer Protection Lawyer in zip code 02139

Lee D. Goldstein

Rating: 4.2


Area of Practice: Business & Commercial,Business Organizations,Child Custody & Visitation,Child Support,Civil Rights,Consumer Protection,Contracts,Divorce,Employment & Labor ,Estate Planning,Family ,Landlord & Tenant,Probate ,Real Estate ,Sexual Harassment,Trusts,Wills

Zip code: 02139, Cambridge, Massachusetts



Contact: (617) 492-8473
Goldstein and Feuer.
702   678 Avenue Massachuset.

Janet R. Werkman - top best Consumer Protection Lawyer in zip code 02139

Janet R. Werkman

Area of Practice: Bankruptcy,Consumer Protection

Zip code: 02139, Cambridge, Massachusetts



Contact: (617) 868-2580
Law Office of Janet Werkman.
929 Ave.

FAQs - Consumer Protection Attorneys in 02139

Consumer Protection Case examples in zip code 02139

Legal matters involving protection of consumers in business transactions. Case Example: Doe v. Business (2019) - Dispute over consumer rights and business practices. Judgment: The court ruled in favor of consumer protection claims and awarded damages.