Lawbamba

Top best Fair Employment Practices Lawyer in zip code 10006 - Silvia Stanciu

Home   ➤ New York   ➤➤ Zip- 10006 - New York - Fair Employment Practices

Silvia Stanciu is among the top best Fair Employment Practices attorney in zip code 10006. While choosing Fair Employment Practices attorneys in zip code 10006, compare their reviews

Use the Legal issue filters to select and navigate to other areas of practice within the zip.



Silvia Stanciu - top best Fair Employment Practices Lawyer in zip code 10006

Silvia Stanciu

Area of Practice: Civil Rights, Disability Discrimination, Discrimination, Gay and Lesbian Rights, Handicapped Rights, Race Discrimination, Sex Discrimination, Womens Rights, Class Actions, Labor and Employment, Age Discrimination in Employment, Americans With Disabilities Act, Caregiver Discrimination, Confidentiality Agreements, Covenants Not To Compete, Employee Discipline, Employee Rights, Employer Intentional Torts, Employer Liability, Employment Arbitration, Employment Breach of Contract, Employment Civil Rights, Employment Class Actions, Employment Disability Discrimination, Employment Discrimination, Employment Law, Employment Litigation, Employment Mediation, Employment Rights, Employment Terminiation, Employment at Will, Equal Employment Opportunity Law, Executive Severance Contracts, Fair Employment Practices, Fair Labor Standards, Family and Medical Leave Act, Federal Employment Law, Harassment, Minimum Wage Law, National Origin Discrimination, Negligent Hiring, Pregnancy Discrimination, Reductions in Force, Retaliatory Discharge, Sexual Harassment, Title VII Discrimination, Wage and Hour Class Actions, Wage and Hour Law, Whistleblower Litigation, Wrongful Termination, Litigation, Negligence

Zip code: 10006, New York, New York



Contact:
Phillips & Associates, Attorneys at Law, PLLC..
45 Broadway.

count 1 Top best Fair Employment Practices lawyers in New York

Covers legal issues related to fair employment practices. Case Example: Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971), involving employment discrimination. Judgment: The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, establishing the disparate impact theory.