Lawbamba

Top best Complex Commercial Litigation Lawyers in zip code 10017 New York

Home   ➤ New York   ➤➤ Zip- 10017 - New York - Complex Commercial Litigation

We have more than 3 top best Complex Commercial Litigation lawyers in zip code 10017, New York, New York. Noam Besdin, Edward P. Dolido are among the top best Complex Commercial Litigation attorneys in zip code 10017. While choosing lawyers in zip code 10017, compare their reviews.


Noam Besdin - top best Complex Commercial Litigation Lawyer in zip code 10017

Noam Besdin

Area of Practice: Complex Commercial Litigation, Bankruptcy Litigation, Civil Litigation, Federal Civil Litigation

Zip code: 10017, New York, New York



Contact: 212-490-4100
Storch Amini PC.
140 East 45th Street.

Edward P. Dolido - top best Complex Commercial Litigation Lawyer in zip code 10017

Edward P. Dolido

Area of Practice: Business Litigation, Arbitration, Complex Commercial Litigation, Appellate Practice, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Class Actions, Intellectual Property, International Law, RICO, Securities Litigation, Telecommunications Law, Communications and Media

Zip code: 10017, New York, New York



Contact: 212-490-4100
Storch Amini PC.
140 East 45th Street.

William D. Grand - top best Complex Commercial Litigation Lawyer in zip code 10017

William D. Grand

Rating: / 5


Area of Practice: Complex Commercial Litigation, Legal Malpractice Defense, Theft of Trade Secrets, Noncompete Litigation, Environmental Litigation, Breach of Contract, Condemnation, Eminent Domain, Real Estate Litigation

Zip code: 10017, New York, New York



Contact: 732-476-2520
Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP.
750 Third Avenue.

FAQs - Complex Commercial Litigation Attorneys in 10017

Complex Commercial Litigation Case examples in zip code 10017

Description: Deals with complex commercial disputes involving antitrust issues, including market competition and trade practices. Case Example: In re: Optical Disk Drive Antitrust Litigation, 2016 - Addressed complex commercial antitrust claims. Judgment: The court awarded damages based on anti-competitive practices.