Lawbamba

Top best Intellectual Property Infringement Lawyer in zip code 10314 - Michael Heitmann

Home   ➤ New York   ➤➤ ZIP - 10314 - Intellectual Property Infringement - Staten Island
Michael Heitmann is among the top best Intellectual Property Infringement attorney in zip code 10314. While choosing Intellectual Property Infringement attorneys in zip code 10314, compare their reviews


Spin Your ZIP and Find a Lawyer Instantly!

    Spin 🎚

Michael Heitmann - top best Intellectual Property Infringement Lawyer in zip code 10314

Michael Heitmann Top Best Intellectual Property Infringement Lawyer in zip 10314
Michael Heitmann

Rating: / 3


Area of Practice: Business Law, Business Litigation, Buying and Selling of Businesses, Shareholder Disputes, Entrepreneurial Business Law, Joint Ventures, Collections, Commercial Loans, Loan Workouts, Loan Restructuring, Commercial Real Estate, Commercial Real Estate Litigation, Construction Contracts, Construction Finance, Construction Liens, Construction Litigation, Mechanics Liens, Contract Litigation, Piracy, Entertainment Law, Copyrights, Intellectual Property Infringement, Intellectual Property Litigation, Leases and Leasing, Civil Litigation, Nonprofit and Charitable Organizations, Partnership Formation, Partnership Dissolution, Probate, Real Estate, Real Estate Development, Real Estate Joint Ventures, Real Estate Litigation, Asset Protection, Trademarks, Powers of Attorney, Surrogates Court Practice, Estate Litigation, Estate Administration, Wills, Divorce, Matrimonial Law, Uncontested Divorce, Expungements, DUI/DWI, Drug Crimes, Driving While Intoxicated

Zip code: 10314, Staten Island, New York



Contact:
Michael Heitmann, Attorney at Law.
1946 Victory Boulevard.

FAQs - Intellectual Property Infringement Attorneys in 10314

Intellectual Property Infringement Case examples in zip code 10314

This covers claims and litigation related to the unauthorized use or reproduction of intellectual property. Case Example: Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc., 765 F.3d 205 (3rd Cir. 2014). Judgment: The court addressed patent infringement and remedies.


FAQs - Intellectual Property Infringement Attorneys in 10314