Lawbamba
Login

Natural Resources Lawyer in zip code 11758 | 1 Available

Harvey Barrison is among the available Natural Resources attorney in zip code 11758. While choosing Natural Resources attorneys in zip code 11758, compare their reviews.
🎚

Harvey Barrison - Natural Resources Lawyer in zip code 11758

zipcode 11758 Natural Resources Lawyer - Harvey Barrison
Harvey Barrison

Ratings:
Avvo Rating: Rated 3.4 out of 5
Lawyers.com Rating: Rated 3.4 out of 5



Area of Practice: Natural Resources, Appeals

Zip code: 11758, Massapequa, New York



Contact: Not Available
Harvey Barrison.
10 Sunset Blvd.

Save this search to MyLawbamba
Share this Listing

No Q&As yet near 11758 (Natural Resources)

Be the first to ask Lawbamba Community. Real Local lawyers answer.

Natural Resources
11758
Open full form

By posting, you agree this is general information, not legal advice.

Selecting a Natural Resources Attorney in 11758

No Q&As yet near 11758 (Natural Resources)

Be the first to ask Lawbamba Community. Real Local lawyers answer.

Natural Resources
11758
Open full form

By posting, you agree this is general information, not legal advice.

Selecting a Natural Resources Attorney in 11758


Explore more Natural Resources Lawyers in ZIP Codes Nearby 11758

Mineola, New York (ZIP 11501) - 11.5 miles away

Hauppauge, New York (ZIP 11749) - 18.3 miles away

Brooklyn, New York (ZIP 10461) - 24.1 miles away

Bronx, New York (ZIP 10469) - 25.3 miles away

Bronx, New York (ZIP 10470) - 27.3 miles away

New York, New York (ZIP 10022) - 27.8 miles away

Stamford, Connecticut (ZIP 06901) - 28.0 miles away

New York, New York (ZIP 10036) - 28.9 miles away

Hamden, Connecticut (ZIP 06518) - 60.5 miles away

Meriden, Connecticut (ZIP 06450) - 70.4 miles away

Natural Resources Case examples in zip code 11758

Description: Legal issues concerning the extraction and management of natural resources, including oil, gas, and minerals. Case Example: Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon (1922) - This landmark case addressed the regulation of mining activities and property rights. Judgment: The Supreme Court held that regulation could go too far and become a taking under the Fifth Amendment, requiring compensation.