Lawbamba

Top best Motor Vehicle Defects Lawyer in zip code 14614 - James A. Napier

Home   ➤ New York   ➤➤ Zip- 14614 - Rochester - Motor Vehicle Defects

James A. Napier is among the top best Motor Vehicle Defects attorney in zip code 14614. While choosing Motor Vehicle Defects attorneys in zip code 14614, compare their reviews

Use the Legal issue filters to select and navigate to other areas of practice within the zip.



James A. Napier - top best Motor Vehicle Defects Lawyer in zip code 14614

James A. Napier

Rating: 5


Area of Practice: Animal Bites,Antitrust & Trade Regulation,Asbestos ,Assault & Battery,Banking & Finance,Bankruptcy,Criminal Defense ,Drugs & Medical Devices,Environmental ,Insurance ,Land Use & Zoning,Landlord & Tenant,Motor Vehicle Accidents,Motor Vehicle Defects,Personal Injury,Premises Liability,Products Liability,Real Estate ,Toxic Substances,Traffic Violations,Wrongful Death

Zip code: 14614, Rochester, New York

James A. Napier Avvo Reviews
Mr. Napier is a very capable attorney, but isn't quite as responsive as I would have liked him to be. That's not entirely his fault -- he hasn't resp... ...

Contact: (585) 232-4474
Napier & Napier.
36 Main St W   500 New  146141701.

Robert A. Napier - top best Motor Vehicle Defects Lawyer in zip code 14614

Robert A. Napier

Rating: 3.6


Area of Practice: Animal Bites,Antitrust & Trade Regulation,Assault & Battery,Banking & Finance,Bankruptcy,Criminal Defense ,Insurance ,Landlord & Tenant,Motor Vehicle Accidents,Motor Vehicle Defects,Personal Injury,Premises Liability,Products Liability,Real Estate ,Traffic Violations,Wrongful Death

Zip code: 14614, Rochester, New York



Contact: (585) 232-4474
Napier & Napier.
36 Main St W   500 New  146141701.

count 2 Top best Motor Vehicle Defects lawyers in Rochester

Legal issues involving defects in motor vehicles that lead to accidents or injuries. Case Example: Johnson v. Ford Motor Co., 2015 WL 1015585 (N.D. Cal. 2015) ?he case involved a defect in a vehicle that caused an accident. Judgment: The court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, determining the manufacturer was liable for the defects leading to the accident.