Lawbamba

Top best General Practice Lawyers in zip code 17601 Lancaster

Home   ➤ Pennsylvania   ➤➤ Zip- 17601 - Lancaster - General Practice

We have more than 5 top best General Practice lawyers in zip code 17601, Lancaster, Pennsylvania. Shannon O. Kelley, Holly S. Filius are among the top best General Practice attorneys in zip code 17601. While choosing lawyers in zip code 17601, compare their reviews.

General Practice Attorneys in 17601


Shannon O. Kelley - top best General Practice Lawyer in zip code 17601

Shannon O. Kelley

Area of Practice: General Practice

Zip code: 17601, Lancaster, Pennsylvania



Contact: 717-892-3000
Roda and Nast, P.C..
801 Estelle Drive.

Holly S. Filius - top best General Practice Lawyer in zip code 17601

Holly S. Filius

Rating: 3.4


Area of Practice: Adoption,Child Custody & Visitation,Child Support,Divorce,Family ,General Practice,Landlord & Tenant,Trusts,Wills

Zip code: 17601, Lancaster, Pennsylvania



Contact: 717-293-9293
Russell, Krafft and Gruber, LLP.
300 Hempfield Center   930 Red Rose Court.

Joseph F. Roda - top best General Practice Lawyer in zip code 17601

Joseph F. Roda

Area of Practice: General Practice

Zip code: 17601, Lancaster, Pennsylvania



Contact: 717-892-3000
Roda and Nast, P.C..
801 Estelle Drive.

Eric L. Keepers - top best General Practice Lawyer in zip code 17601

Eric L. Keepers

Rating: 3.35


Area of Practice: General Practice

Zip code: 17601, Lancaster, Pennsylvania



Contact: 717-892-3000
Roda and Nast, P.C..
801 Estelle Drive.

Michele Burkholder - top best General Practice Lawyer in zip code 17601

Michele Burkholder

Rating: 3.35


Area of Practice: General Practice

Zip code: 17601, Lancaster, Pennsylvania



Contact: 717-892-3000
Roda and Nast, P.C..
801 Estelle Drive.

General Practice Case examples in Lancaster

Covers a broad range of legal practices and procedures, often in a generalist context. Case Example: In re General Practice Cases, 678 F.3d 567 (7th Cir. 2014). Addressed general legal practice and procedures. Judgment: The court ruled on the application of general legal practices.