Lawbamba

Top best Copyrights Lawyers in zip code 32789 Winter Park

Home   ➤ Florida   ➤➤ Zip- 32789 - Winter Park - Copyrights

We have more than 3 top best Copyrights lawyers in zip code 32789, Winter Park, Florida. Steven R. Maher, David F. Tegeler are among the top best Copyrights attorneys in zip code 32789. While choosing lawyers in zip code 32789, compare their reviews.


Steven R. Maher - top best Copyrights Lawyer in zip code 32789

Steven R. Maher

Rating: 5


Area of Practice: Copyrights,Medical Malpractice,Nursing Home Negligence,Patents,Personal Injury,Products Liability,Trademarks,Wrongful Death

Zip code: 32789, Winter Park, Florida

Steven R. Maher Avvo Reviews
During the time of loss due to injury caused by the negligence of others--the process of finding the best advocate can be an overwhelming and daunting... ...

Contact: 407-839-0866
Maher, Guiley and Maher, P.A..
631 West Morse Boulevard   200  32.

David F. Tegeler - top best Copyrights Lawyer in zip code 32789

David F. Tegeler

Rating: 3.25


Area of Practice: Administrative ,Arbitration,Civil ,Construction ,Copyrights,Corporate ,Guardianship and Conservatorship,Insurance ,Personal Injury,Professional Malpractice,Real Estate

Zip code: 32789, Winter Park, Florida



Contact: 407-644-7161
Michael C. Sasso, P.A..
1031 West Morse Boulevard   260  3.

J. Brent Smith - top best Copyrights Lawyer in zip code 32789

J. Brent Smith

Rating: 3.35


Area of Practice: Class Actions,Copyrights,Corporate ,Patents,Personal Injury,Products Liability,Trademarks,Wrongful Death

Zip code: 32789, Winter Park, Florida



Contact: 407-839-0866
Maher, Guiley and Maher, P.A..
631 West Morse Boulevard   200  32.

FAQs - Copyrights Attorneys in 32789

Copyrights Case examples in zip code 32789

Description: General legal rights granted to creators of original works, including the exclusive right to reproduce, distribute, and perform their work. Case Example: Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios (1984) - Dispute over the legality of home video recording. Judgment: Court ruled that home recording for private use did not infringe copyrights.