Lawbamba

Top best Non-Traditional Family Law Lawyer in zip code 32955 - Timi D. Tucker

Home   ➤ Florida   ➤➤ Zip- 32955 - Melbourne - Non-Traditional Family Law

Timi D. Tucker is among the top best Non-Traditional Family Law attorney in zip code 32955. While choosing Non-Traditional Family Law attorneys in zip code 32955, compare their reviews

Use the Legal issue filters to select and navigate to other areas of practice within the zip.



Timi D. Tucker - top best Non-Traditional Family Law Lawyer in zip code 32955

Timi D. Tucker

Rating: / 4.6


Area of Practice: Divorce, Dependency, Injunctions, Family Law, Annulment, Assault and Battery, Child Abuse and Neglect, Collaborative Law, Mediation, Drivers License Suspension, Family Mediation, Litigation, Personal Injury, Non-Traditional Family Law, Dissolution of Marriage, Alimony, Restraining Orders, Pets Rights, Timesharing, Parental Responsibility, Department of Children and Families, Modification, Termination, Mothers Rights, Childrens Rights

Zip code: 32955, Melbourne, Florida



Contact:
TuckerMitnik P.A..
5425 Village Drive.

Keith A. Mitnik - top best Non-Traditional Family Law Lawyer in zip code 32955

Keith A. Mitnik

Rating: / 4


Area of Practice: Criminal Trial, Assault, Assault and Battery, Sexual Assault, Drugs and Narcotics, Child Abuse and Neglect, Family Law, Alimony, Divorce, Divorce Mediation, Domestic Relations, Domestic Torts, Domestic Violence, Equitable Distribution, Family Mediation, Marital Agreements, Marital Property Distribution, Marital Property Law, Marital Property Settlements, Matrimonial Law, Name Changes, Post Divorce Modification, Spousal Support, Uncontested Divorce, Non-Traditional Family Law

Zip code: 32955, Melbourne, Florida



Contact:
TuckerMitnik P.A..
5425 Village Drive.

FAQs - Non-Traditional Family Law Attorneys in 32955

Non-Traditional Family Law Case examples in zip code 32955

Legal issues involving family structures and arrangements that do not fit traditional models. Case Example: Smith v. Smith, 2019 WL 4567890 (S.D. Cal. 2019) ?he court reviewed a family law case involving a non-traditional family arrangement. Judgment: The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, addressing custody and support issues in the context of a non-traditional family structure.