Lawbamba

Top best Environmental Lawyers in zip code 36652 Mobile

Home   ➤ Alabama   ➤➤ Zip- 36652 - Mobile - Environmental

We have more than 4 top best Environmental lawyers in zip code 36652, Mobile, Alabama. Lisa Bradford Hansen, Timothy A. Clarke are among the top best Environmental attorneys in zip code 36652. While choosing lawyers in zip code 36652, compare their reviews.


Lisa Bradford Hansen - top best Environmental Lawyer in zip code 36652

Lisa Bradford Hansen

Rating: 3.35


Area of Practice: Civil ,Environmental ,Labor ,Toxic Substances,Workers Compensation

Zip code: 36652, Mobile, Alabama



Contact: 251-432-9772
Vickers, Riis, Murray and Curran, L.L.C..
11th Floor   Regions Bank Building  3665.

Timothy A. Clarke - top best Environmental Lawyer in zip code 36652

Timothy A. Clarke

Rating: 3.35


Area of Practice: Asbestos ,Environmental ,General Practice,Personal Injury,Probate ,Products Liability,Toxic Substances

Zip code: 36652, Mobile, Alabama



Contact: 251-432-9772
Vickers, Riis, Murray and Curran, L.L.C..
11th Floor   Regions Bank Building  3665.

Walter Cook - top best Environmental Lawyer in zip code 36652

Walter Cook

Rating: 3.55


Area of Practice: Construction ,Contracts,Drugs & Medical Devices,Employment & Labor ,Environmental ,Products Liability,Professional Malpractice,Toxic Substances

Zip code: 36652, Mobile, Alabama



Contact: (334) 432-4481
Lyons, Pipes & Cook.
PO Box 2727   2 N Royal Street  36652.

Norton Brooker - top best Environmental Lawyer in zip code 36652

Norton Brooker

Area of Practice: Energy ,Environmental ,Natural Resources,Real Estate

Zip code: 36652, Mobile, Alabama



Contact: (334) 432-4481
Lyons, Pipes & Cook.
PO Box 2727   2 N Royal Street  36652.

FAQs - Environmental Attorneys in 36652

Environmental Case examples in zip code 36652

Legal issues related to compliance with California's environmental review process for public projects. Case Example: Smith v. CEQA Compliance (2021) - Dispute over failure to comply with CEQA requirements for environmental review. Judgment: $400,000 awarded for non-compliance.