Lawbamba

Top best Domestic Partnership Lawyers in zip code 37404 Chattanooga

Home   ➤ Tennessee   ➤➤ Zip- 37404 - Chattanooga - Domestic Partnership

We have more than 3 top best Domestic Partnership lawyers in zip code 37404, Chattanooga, Tennessee. Jason D. Demastus, Robert Jeffrey Wolford are among the top best Domestic Partnership attorneys in zip code 37404. While choosing lawyers in zip code 37404, compare their reviews.


Jason D. Demastus - top best Domestic Partnership Lawyer in zip code 37404

Jason D. Demastus

Rating: 1


Area of Practice: Bankruptcy,Business & Commercial,Civil ,Collections,Criminal Defense ,Domestic Partnership,Wills

Zip code: 37404, Chattanooga, Tennessee

Jason D. Demastus Avvo Reviews
I did all the leg work on the case. It was like I didn't have a lawyer at all. He left the law firm during the case and went to work for the DA's off... ...

Contact: 423-622-4535
Kennedy, Koontz and Farinash.
320 North Holtzclaw Avenue.

Robert Jeffrey Wolford - top best Domestic Partnership Lawyer in zip code 37404

Robert Jeffrey Wolford

Rating: 3.2


Area of Practice: Bankruptcy,Collections,Corporate ,Criminal Defense ,Domestic Partnership,Personal Injury,Social Security Benefits & Disability,Workers Compensation

Zip code: 37404, Chattanooga, Tennessee

Robert Jeffrey Wolford Avvo Reviews
...

Contact: 423-622-4535
Kennedy, Koontz and Farinash.
320 North Holtzclaw Avenue.

George E. Koontz - top best Domestic Partnership Lawyer in zip code 37404

George E. Koontz

Rating: 3.35


Area of Practice: Business & Commercial,Collections,Corporate ,Domestic Partnership,Employment & Labor ,Health Care & Hospitalization,Personal Injury

Zip code: 37404, Chattanooga, Tennessee



Contact: 423-622-4535
Kennedy, Koontz and Farinash.
320 North Holtzclaw Avenue.

FAQs - Domestic Partnership Attorneys in 37404

Domestic Partnership Case examples in zip code 37404

Legal issues surrounding domestic partnerships. Case Example: Smith v. City of Chicago (2016) - Case involving domestic partnership benefits and rights. Judgment: The court ruled in favor of extending benefits to domestic partners.