Lawbamba

Top best Drug and Cosmetics Lawyers in zip code 53202 Milwaukee

Home   ➤ Wisconsin   ➤➤ Zip- 53202 - Milwaukee - Drug and Cosmetics

We have more than 4 top best Drug and Cosmetics lawyers in zip code 53202, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Shawn K. Stevens, Michael T. Hart are among the top best Drug and Cosmetics attorneys in zip code 53202. While choosing lawyers in zip code 53202, compare their reviews.


Shawn K. Stevens - top best Drug and Cosmetics Lawyer in zip code 53202

Shawn K. Stevens

Rating: 5


Area of Practice: Business ,Civil ,Food, Drug and Cosmetics,Medical Malpractice,Products Liability

Zip code: 53202, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Shawn K. Stevens Avvo Reviews
Shawn is a phenomenal attorney. When nobody else could help us, we hired Shawn. He conducted his own investigation and upturned the findings of the he... ...

Contact: 414-223-3300
Gass Weber Mullins LLC.
309 N Water Street.

Michael T. Hart - top best Drug and Cosmetics Lawyer in zip code 53202

Michael T. Hart

Rating: 3.35


Area of Practice: Food, Drug and Cosmetics,Products Liability

Zip code: 53202, Milwaukee, Wisconsin



Contact: 414-273-2100

555 East Wells Street.

James P. Peterson - top best Drug and Cosmetics Lawyer in zip code 53202

James P. Peterson

Rating: 4.95


Area of Practice: Business & Commercial,Food, Drug and Cosmetics,Mergers & Acquisitions,Securities

Zip code: 53202, Milwaukee, Wisconsin



Contact: 414-297-5892

777 East Avenue.

Bernard J. Bobber - top best Drug and Cosmetics Lawyer in zip code 53202

Bernard J. Bobber

Rating: 4.9


Area of Practice: Civil ,Corporate ,Employment & Labor ,Food, Drug and Cosmetics,Labor

Zip code: 53202, Milwaukee, Wisconsin



Contact: 414-297-5803

777 East Avenue.

FAQs - Drug and Cosmetics Attorneys in 53202

Drug and Cosmetics Case examples in zip code 53202

Involves legal issues related to food, drugs, and cosmetics regulation. Case Example: FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120 (2000). Addressed regulation of food, drugs, and cosmetics. Judgment: The court ruled on the extent of regulatory authority.