Lawbamba

Top best Franchise Lawyers in zip code 53701 Madison

Home   ➤ Wisconsin   ➤➤ Zip- 53701 - Madison - Franchise

We have more than 5 top best Franchise lawyers in zip code 53701, Madison, Wisconsin. Brian E. Butler, James R. Conohan are among the top best Franchise attorneys in zip code 53701. While choosing lawyers in zip code 53701, compare their reviews.


Brian E. Butler - top best Franchise Lawyer in zip code 53701

Brian E. Butler

Rating: 5


Area of Practice: Antitrust & Trade Regulation,Automobile Accidents,Business ,Defamation, Libel and Slander,Franchise ,Legal Malpractice,Mediation

Zip code: 53701, Madison, Wisconsin



Contact: 608-256-0226

West Washington Street.

James R. Conohan - top best Franchise Lawyer in zip code 53701

James R. Conohan

Rating: 3.35


Area of Practice: Business & Commercial,Franchise

Zip code: 53701, Madison, Wisconsin



Contact: 608-258-4217

150 East Gilman Street .

Gary L. Antoniewicz - top best Franchise Lawyer in zip code 53701

Gary L. Antoniewicz

Rating: 3.35


Area of Practice: Business & Commercial,Consumer Protection,Contracts,Franchise

Zip code: 53701, Madison, Wisconsin



Contact: 608-257-9521

One South Pinckney Street.

William M. Conley - top best Franchise Lawyer in zip code 53701

William M. Conley

Rating: 3.35


Area of Practice: Antitrust & Trade Regulation,Appellate ,Business & Commercial,Corporate ,Franchise ,Regulatory ,Transportation

Zip code: 53701, Madison, Wisconsin



Contact: 608-258-4209

150 East Gilman Street .

Antonina Prestigiacomo - top best Franchise Lawyer in zip code 53701

Antonina Prestigiacomo

Rating: 3.25


Area of Practice: Banking & Finance,Business & Commercial,Franchise ,Real Estate

Zip code: 53701, Madison, Wisconsin



Contact: 608-258-4765

150 East Gilman Street .

count 5 Top best Franchise lawyers in Madison

Description: Legal issues related to the operation and regulation of automotive franchises and dealerships. Case Example: In Smith v. Franchise Owner (2020), the case involved disputes over dealership practices. Judgment: The court ruled on compliance with franchise regulations.