Lawbamba

Top best Copyrights Lawyers in zip code 60661 Chicago

Home   ➤ Illinois   ➤➤ Zip- 60661 - Chicago - Copyrights

We have more than 5 top best Copyrights lawyers in zip code 60661, Chicago, Illinois. Troy A. Groetken, John J. Held are among the top best Copyrights attorneys in zip code 60661. While choosing lawyers in zip code 60661, compare their reviews.


Troy A. Groetken - top best Copyrights Lawyer in zip code 60661

Troy A. Groetken

Rating: 3.25


Area of Practice: Copyrights,Intellectual Property ,Patents,Trademarks

Zip code: 60661, Chicago, Illinois



Contact: 312-775-8000

3Fourth Floor   500 West Madison Street  6.

John J. Held - top best Copyrights Lawyer in zip code 60661

John J. Held

Rating: 3.25


Area of Practice: Copyrights,Patents,Trademarks

Zip code: 60661, Chicago, Illinois



Contact: 312-775-8000

3Fourth Floor   500 West Madison Street  6.

Timothy J. Malloy - top best Copyrights Lawyer in zip code 60661

Timothy J. Malloy

Rating: 3.25


Area of Practice: Civil ,Contracts,Copyrights,Intellectual Property ,Patents,Trademarks

Zip code: 60661, Chicago, Illinois



Contact: 312-775-8000

3Fourth Floor   500 West Madison Street  6.

Robert J. Brill - top best Copyrights Lawyer in zip code 60661

Robert J. Brill

Area of Practice: Copyrights,Intellectual Property ,Patents,Trademarks

Zip code: 60661, Chicago, Illinois



Contact: 312-876-1800

Citicorp Center   3800.

Christian Miller - top best Copyrights Lawyer in zip code 60661

Christian Miller

Area of Practice: Patents, Trademarks, Copyrights, Trade Secrets

Zip code: 60661, Chicago, Illinois



Contact: 312-876-2108
Wood, Phillips, Katz, Clark & Mortimer.
500 West Madison Street.

Copyrights Attorneys in 60661

Copyrights Case examples in zip code 60661

Description: General legal rights granted to creators of original works, including the exclusive right to reproduce, distribute, and perform their work. Case Example: Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios (1984) - Dispute over the legality of home video recording. Judgment: Court ruled that home recording for private use did not infringe copyrights.