Lawbamba

Top best Commercial Litigation Lawyers in zip code 64105 Kansas City

Home   ➤ Missouri   ➤➤ Zip- 64105 - Kansas City - Commercial Litigation

We have more than 4 top best Commercial Litigation lawyers in zip code 64105, Kansas City, Missouri. Dylan M. Long, John M. Edgar are among the top best Commercial Litigation attorneys in zip code 64105. While choosing lawyers in zip code 64105, compare their reviews.


Dylan M. Long - top best Commercial Litigation Lawyer in zip code 64105

Dylan M. Long

Area of Practice: Class Actions, Commercial Litigation

Zip code: 64105, Kansas City, Missouri



Contact: 816-531-0033
Edgar Law Firm LLC.
1032 Pennsylvania Avenue.

John M. Edgar - top best Commercial Litigation Lawyer in zip code 64105

John M. Edgar

Rating: / 5


Area of Practice: Commercial Litigation, Business Torts, Fraud, Class Actions, Antitrust

Zip code: 64105, Kansas City, Missouri



Contact: 816-531-0033
Edgar Law Firm LLC.
1032 Pennsylvania Avenue.

John F. Edgar - top best Commercial Litigation Lawyer in zip code 64105

John F. Edgar

Rating: / 5


Area of Practice: Commercial Litigation, Consumer Protection, Class Actions, Products Liability, Antitrust, Environmental Law

Zip code: 64105, Kansas City, Missouri



Contact: 816-531-0033
Edgar Law Firm LLC.
1032 Pennsylvania Avenue.

Tim E. Dollar - top best Commercial Litigation Lawyer in zip code 64105

Tim E. Dollar

Rating: / 5


Area of Practice: Truck Accidents, Civil Litigation, Nursing Home Abuse and Neglect, Personal Injury, Medical Malpractice, Products Liability, Airplane Crash Litigation, Complex Commercial Litigation

Zip code: 64105, Kansas City, Missouri



Contact: 816-876-2600
Dollar, Burns & Becker L.C..
1100 Main Street.

FAQs - Commercial Litigation Attorneys in 64105

Commercial Litigation Case examples in zip code 64105

Description: Deals with complex commercial disputes involving antitrust issues, including market competition and trade practices. Case Example: In re: Optical Disk Drive Antitrust Litigation, 2016 - Addressed complex commercial antitrust claims. Judgment: The court awarded damages based on anti-competitive practices.