Lawbamba

Top best Commercial Litigation Lawyers in zip code 70112 New Orleans

Home   ➤ Louisiana   ➤➤ Zip- 70112 - New Orleans - Commercial Litigation

We have more than 4 top best Commercial Litigation lawyers in zip code 70112, New Orleans, Louisiana. Jake Airey, Lyon H. Garrison are among the top best Commercial Litigation attorneys in zip code 70112. While choosing lawyers in zip code 70112, compare their reviews.


Jake Airey - top best Commercial Litigation Lawyer in zip code 70112

Jake Airey

Area of Practice: Commercial Litigation, Admiralty Law

Zip code: 70112, New Orleans, Louisiana



Contact:
Sher Garner Cahill Richter Klein & Hilbert, L.L.C..
909 Poydras Street.

Lyon H. Garrison - top best Commercial Litigation Lawyer in zip code 70112

Lyon H. Garrison

Rating: / 4.8


Area of Practice: Casualty Insurance, Products Liability, Workers Compensation, Labor and Employment, Toxic Torts, Premises Liability, Commercial Litigation

Zip code: 70112, New Orleans, Louisiana



Contact:
Garrison, Yount, Forte, & Mulcahy L.L.C..
909 Poydras Street.

Brandon Keay - top best Commercial Litigation Lawyer in zip code 70112

Brandon Keay

Area of Practice: Commercial Litigation, Appellate Work, Intellectual Property, Admiralty & Maritime Law, Business & Commercial Law

Zip code: 70112, New Orleans, Louisiana



Contact:
Sher Garner Cahill Richter Klein & Hilbert, L.L.C..
909 Poydras Street.

Wesley M. Plaisance - top best Commercial Litigation Lawyer in zip code 70112

Wesley M. Plaisance

Rating: / 4.7


Area of Practice: Commercial Litigation, Real Estate, Tax Sale and Quiet Title Litigation, Gaming

Zip code: 70112, New Orleans, Louisiana



Contact: 504-584-5471
Breazeale, Sachse & Wilson, L.L.P..
909 Poydras Street.

FAQs - Commercial Litigation Attorneys in 70112

Commercial Litigation Case examples in zip code 70112

Description: Deals with complex commercial disputes involving antitrust issues, including market competition and trade practices. Case Example: In re: Optical Disk Drive Antitrust Litigation, 2016 - Addressed complex commercial antitrust claims. Judgment: The court awarded damages based on anti-competitive practices.