Lawbamba

Top best Products Liability Lawyer in zip code 80027 - James C. Tienken

Home   ➤ Colorado   ➤➤ Zip- 80027 - Louisville - Products Liability

James C. Tienken is among the top best Products Liability attorney in zip code 80027. While choosing Products Liability attorneys in zip code 80027, compare their reviews

Use the Legal issue filters to select and navigate to other areas of practice within the zip.



James C. Tienken - top best Products Liability Lawyer in zip code 80027

James C. Tienken

Rating: 3.65


Area of Practice: Animal Bites,Asbestos ,Assault & Battery,Aviation & Aerospace,Business & Commercial,Business Organizations,Civil Rights,Communications & Media ,Constitutional ,Construction ,Contracts,Discrimination,Drugs & Medical Devices,Estate Planning,Ethics & Professional Responsibility,Housing & Construction Defects,Insurance ,Internet ,Land Use & Zoning,Landlord & Tenant,Legal Malpractice,Medical Malpractice,Motor Vehicle Accidents,Motor Vehicle Defects,Personal Injury,Premises Liability,Probate ,Products Liability,Professional Malpractice,Real Estate ,Sexual Harassment,Toxic Substances,Transportation ,Trusts,Wills,Wrongful Death

Zip code: 80027, Louisville, Colorado

James C. Tienken Avvo Reviews
I used James when purchasing my rental property. James was patient and very responsive and put together documents for me several times on short notice... ...

Contact: (303) 673-9373
Tienken & Hill, L.L.P..
726 Front St   B.

Alexander Garlin - top best Products Liability Lawyer in zip code 80027

Alexander Garlin

Rating: 4.3


Area of Practice: Criminal Defense ,Personal Injury,Products Liability

Zip code: 80027, Louisville, Colorado



Contact: 303-926-4222
Garlin Driscoll Howard, LLC.
245 Century Circle 101.

FAQs - Products Liability Attorneys in 80027

Products Liability Case examples in zip code 80027

Description: Deals with claims related to defects in ATVs, including design and manufacturing flaws. Case Example: Davis v. Polaris Industries, Inc., 2020 - Focused on product liability claims for defective ATVs. Judgment: The court awarded damages for injuries caused by the defective ATV.