Lawbamba

Top best Intellectual Property Lawyers in zip code 85701 Tucson

Home   ➤ Arizona   ➤➤ Zip- 85701 - Tucson - Intellectual Property

We have more than 5 top best Intellectual Property lawyers in zip code 85701, Tucson, Arizona. Deanna Conn, Antonio R. Durando are among the top best Intellectual Property attorneys in zip code 85701. While choosing lawyers in zip code 85701, compare their reviews.


Deanna Conn - top best Intellectual Property Lawyer in zip code 85701

Deanna Conn

Rating: 3.25


Area of Practice: Corporate ,Corporate ,Intellectual Property ,Internet

Zip code: 85701, Tucson, Arizona



Contact: 520-770-8700

One South Church Avenue   1700  85.

Antonio R. Durando - top best Intellectual Property Lawyer in zip code 85701

Antonio R. Durando

Rating: 3.25


Area of Practice: Intellectual Property

Zip code: 85701, Tucson, Arizona



Contact: 520-770-8700

One South Church Avenue   1700  85.

Gavin J. Milczarek-Desai - top best Intellectual Property Lawyer in zip code 85701

Gavin J. Milczarek-Desai

Rating: 3.3


Area of Practice: Intellectual Property

Zip code: 85701, Tucson, Arizona



Contact: 520-770-8700
Quarles and Brady LLP.
One South Church Avenue   1700  85.

Sivan R. Korn - top best Intellectual Property Lawyer in zip code 85701

Sivan R. Korn

Rating: 3.35


Area of Practice: Antitrust & Trade Regulation,Corporate ,Intellectual Property

Zip code: 85701, Tucson, Arizona



Contact: 520-838-7722
Lewis and Roca LLP.
One South Church Avenue 700.

Michael F. McNulty - top best Intellectual Property Lawyer in zip code 85701

Michael F. McNulty

Rating: 3.8


Area of Practice: Administrative ,Environmental ,Intellectual Property ,Internet ,Natural Resources,Regulatory

Zip code: 85701, Tucson, Arizona



Contact: 520-629-4453

One South Church Avenue 700.

count 5 Top best Intellectual Property lawyers in Tucson

Legal issues involving intellectual property within business contexts. Case Example: Smith v. IP Holder (2020) - Dispute over intellectual property rights and infringement. Judgment: The court ruled on the validity of intellectual property claims and awarded damages.