Lawbamba

Top best Local Government Law Lawyer in zip code 85701 - Stanley G. Feldman

Home   ➤ Arizona   ➤➤ ZIP - 85701 - Local Government Law - Tucson
Stanley G. Feldman is among the top best Local Government Law attorney in zip code 85701. While choosing Local Government Law attorneys in zip code 85701, compare their reviews


Spin Your ZIP and Find a Lawyer Instantly!

    Spin 🎚

Stanley G. Feldman - top best Local Government Law Lawyer in zip code 85701

Stanley G. Feldman Top Best Local Government Law Lawyer in zip 85701
Stanley G. Feldman

Rating: / 4.9


Area of Practice: Torts, Products Liability, Medical Malpractice, Legal Malpractice, Government, Arbitration, Mediation, Commercial Litigation, Antitrust Litigation, Eminent Domain, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Civil Appeals, Appellate Practice, Constitutional Law, Condemnation, Inverse Condemnation, Property Rights, County Liability, Federal Tort Claims, Government Immunity, Government Tort Liability, Governmental Liability, State Government Law, Local Government Law, State Legislative Practice, Insurance, Commercial Insurance, Disability Insurance, Automobile Insurance, Automobile Insurance Coverage, Casualty Insurance, Commercial Property Insurance, Excess and Reinsurance, Excess Coverage, Extra Contractual Insurance Claims, First Party Insurance, General Liability, Insurance Bad Faith, Insurance Coverage, Insurance Litigation, Public Liability, Unfair Insurance Practices, Uninsured and Underinsured Motorists, Legal Professional Liability, Legal Malpractice Defense, Personal Injury, Personal Injury Appeals, Wrongful Death

Zip code: 85701, Tucson, Arizona



Contact:
Haralson, Miller, Pitt, Feldman & McAnally, P.L.C..
One South Church Avenue.

FAQs - Local Government Law Attorneys in 85701

Local Government Law Case examples in zip code 85701

General legal issues and regulations affecting local government operations. DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, 489 U.S. 189 (1989). Case Example: The court reviewed local government responsibilities under social services regulations. Judgment: The court ruled that local government had no constitutional duty to protect children from abuse in this case.


FAQs - Local Government Law Attorneys in 85701