Lawbamba

Top best Constitutional Lawyer in zip code 90401 - Robert M. Moss

Home   ➤ California   ➤➤ Zip- 90401 - Santa Monica - Constitutional

Robert M. Moss is among the top best Constitutional attorney in zip code 90401. While choosing Constitutional attorneys in zip code 90401, compare their reviews

Use the Legal issue filters to select and navigate to other areas of practice within the zip.



Robert M. Moss - top best Constitutional Lawyer in zip code 90401

Robert M. Moss

Rating: 5


Area of Practice: Administrative ,Adoption,Arbitration & Mediation,Aviation & Aerospace,Bankruptcy,Child Custody & Visitation,Child Support,Communications & Media ,Constitutional ,Construction ,Consumer Protection,Contracts,Criminal Defense ,Debtor/Creditor,Discrimination,Divorce,Employment & Labor ,Entertainment & Sports ,Estate Planning,Ethics & Professional Responsibility,Family ,Labor ,Landlord & Tenant,Legal Malpractice,Lemon ,Medical Malpractice,Motor Vehicle Accidents,Probate ,Products Liability,Professional Malpractice,Sexual Harassment,Social Security Benefits & Disability,Taxation - State & Federal,Toxic Substances,Traffic Violations,Workers Compensation

Zip code: 90401, Santa Monica, California

Robert M. Moss Avvo Reviews
Robert has been my representation on numerous matters over the course of the past 7 years and his services have always yielded a result that far surpa... ...

Contact: (310)260-7650
Law Offices of Robert M. Moss Inc..
1416 Sixth Street 510.

Jeffrey J. Douglas - top best Constitutional Lawyer in zip code 90401

Jeffrey J. Douglas

Rating: 3.9


Area of Practice: Constitutional ,Criminal Defense

Zip code: 90401, Santa Monica, California



Contact: 310-576-3411
Jeffrey J. Douglas.
1717 Fourth Street   Third Floor  904.

FAQs - Constitutional Attorneys in 90401

Constitutional Case examples in zip code 90401

Description: Legal matters involving civil rights under constitutional provisions. Case Example: Gonzalez v. State of California (2019) Judgment: Case involving constitutional rights violations, resulting in policy changes and a $300,000 settlement.