Lawbamba

Top best Copyrights Lawyers in zip code 91367 Woodland Hills

Home   ➤ California   ➤➤ Zip- 91367 - Woodland Hills - Copyrights

We have more than 5 top best Copyrights lawyers in zip code 91367, Woodland Hills, California. Stephen A. Lenske, Aaron T. Borrowman are among the top best Copyrights attorneys in zip code 91367. While choosing lawyers in zip code 91367, compare their reviews.


Stephen A. Lenske - top best Copyrights Lawyer in zip code 91367

Stephen A. Lenske

Rating: 3.5


Area of Practice: Appellate ,Business & Commercial,Copyrights,Gaming ,Real Estate ,Trademarks

Zip code: 91367, Woodland Hills, California



Contact: 818-716-1444
Lenske, Lenske and Abramson, A Law Corporation.
315 Warner Atriums   6400 Canoga Avenue Ca.

Aaron T. Borrowman - top best Copyrights Lawyer in zip code 91367

Aaron T. Borrowman

Area of Practice: Copyrights,Patents,Trademarks

Zip code: 91367, Woodland Hills, California



Contact: 818-347-7900
Kelly Lowry and Kelley, LLP.
6320 Canoga Avenue 1650.

Michael A. DiNardo - top best Copyrights Lawyer in zip code 91367

Michael A. DiNardo

Rating: 3.55


Area of Practice: Civil ,Copyrights,Patents,Trademarks

Zip code: 91367, Woodland Hills, California



Contact: 818-347-7900
Kelly Lowry and Kelley, LLP.
6320 Canoga Avenue 1650.

Amy M. Cohen - top best Copyrights Lawyer in zip code 91367

Amy M. Cohen

Rating: 3.35


Area of Practice: Business & Commercial,Business ,Civil ,Copyrights,Corporate ,Trademarks

Zip code: 91367, Woodland Hills, California



Contact: 818-501-5800

21333 Oxnard Street   First Floor  91.

Scott M. Lowry - top best Copyrights Lawyer in zip code 91367

Scott M. Lowry

Area of Practice: Civil ,Copyrights,Intellectual Property ,Patents,Trademarks

Zip code: 91367, Woodland Hills, California



Contact: 818-347-7900
Kelly Lowry and Kelley, LLP.
6320 Canoga Avenue 1650.

Copyrights Attorneys in 91367

Copyrights Case examples in zip code 91367

Description: General legal rights granted to creators of original works, including the exclusive right to reproduce, distribute, and perform their work. Case Example: Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios (1984) - Dispute over the legality of home video recording. Judgment: Court ruled that home recording for private use did not infringe copyrights.